Quantcast
Channel: The Sierra Madre Tattler!
Viewing all 4055 articles
Browse latest View live

The Library Board of Trustees has hired a Consultant, and his name is Joseph R. Matthews

$
0
0
Mod: I'm pretty sure that what follows isn't information you'll find on the Library survey postcard that is going out in the next week or two, so I'll bring it up here. Apparently the Library Board of Trustees has hired a noted consultant by the name of Joseph R. Matthews.

Joe is a sought after expert on Libraries, and he has some interesting theories on how they should function, both now and into the future. I am not certain in what capacity he was hired, or how much sway he has with these Library worthies. I guess we'll just have to wait a little and see.

But he did write a notable book, one that could very well have caught the attention of certain concerned residents in Sierra Madre. So much so that they might want to change the way the library gets done. More on that in a minute. Here is how Joe is mentioned in the 12.18 meeting agenda of the Community Services Commission (link):

The Library Board of Trustees are meeting further with their Library Planner/ Consultant, Joe Matthews, and Community Services Commission is being extended an invitation to share in their discussions next month January. More information will be forthcoming. 

More information hasn't been forthcoming I'm afraid, or if it has I cannot find it. Perhaps Joe will be at the meeting tomorrow night, but I can't confirm that, either. Like all consultants he must be charging something for his services, yet I don't know how much or who paid it. I'm sure there was a budget to tap into for this somewhere. There usually is these days. Things are much more checkbook lately.

However, and as we noted above, Joe Matthews did write a book. It is called "The Customer Focused Library," and if the information put out by his publisher is any indication, it must be a very exciting one. Or at least as far as books about libraries go. At $50 bucks a pop, and for a mere 95 pages, including pictures, it had better be.

Here is an interesting blurb, which comes to us from the book's publisher, an outfit called ABC-CLIOSolutions (link).

"Public libraries aren’t just libraries anymore. More and more, they are becoming alternative Internet cafes, music stores, movie stores, study halls, and more. But instead of making changes piecemeal to accommodate a changing world and a changing audience, it is time for libraries to be reconceived from the ground up—or more precisely, from the outside in."

It would be pretty cool if the new library did have a Starbucks, like Barnes & Noble. I know that would get my kids there. In a city heartbeat. Just bring your laptop, Beats headphones, and a few Facebook friends.

Here it is in an original context, followed by a book flyer put out by the publisher.


Don't get me wrong, all of this isn't necessarily bad. It certainly is modern, cutting edge, and up to date. As they say. And I am sure it is a well-intentioned effort to make libraries relevant again in a world that is increasingly overwhelmed by the decentralizing forces of the digital revolution. Hardly the easiest thing to do.

But here's a point that someone made on this site a few days ago. Aren't these all the sorts of things things that kids, and most adults for that matter, already have at home? Do people really need to go to a library to take in all that the Internet already has to offer? Can't they just pull out their laptops and do the same things just about anywhere else? Such as laying on a couch with their feet up?

It seems to me that the biggest challenge libraries face nowadays is getting people off of their computers and back into books. Reading can be hard, it takes some real effort. And who has the time when you're far too busy doing other things? Like surfing the Internet?

What Matthews is offering here is a kind of capitulation to the very forces that are making libraries increasingly irrelevant these days. Apparently what library customers consume is no longer of importance. Now it is just the matter of getting them into the building that counts.

But these aren't the sorts of things you need to go to a library to experience. And I am not sure that many people would.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

‘Don’t ever preach to me again!’: Ex-GOP chair tells evangelicals who still support Trump to ‘shut the hell up!’

$
0
0
Mod: The President of the United States paid a six figure hush money bribe to a porn star that he had repeatedly propositioned for sex? Right around the time his third wife had given birth to his fifth child? Tell me, is America getting greater yet?

‘Don’t ever preach to me again!’: Ex-GOP chair tells evangelicals who still support Trump to ‘shut the hell up!’ (Raw Storylink): Former Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele blasted Family Research Council president Tony Perkins for giving President Donald Trump a “mulligan” on paying hush money to former adult film star.

“When it comes down to giving Trump a pass, some top evangelical leaders are turning a blind eye to his past discretions and came to his defense following recent reports about his alleged affair with adult film star Stormy Daniels,” news host Chris Matthews explained.

“I have very simple admonition: just shut the hell up and don’t preach to me about anything ever again,” Steele suggested.

“After telling me who to love, what to believe, what to do and what not to do and now you sit back and the prostitutes don’t matter, the grabbing the you-know-what doesn’t matter, the outright behavior and lies don’t matter, just shut up!” Steele blasted.

“They have no voice of authority anymore for me,” Steele concluded.

‘Trump Was Merely Sharing The Gospel With That Porn Star,’ Explains Jim Bakker (The Babylon Beelink): Squashing accusations that President Trump had a sexual encounter with porn star “Stormy Daniels” while he was married to Melania, televangelist Jim Bakker explained to his audience Friday that he had confirmed that Trump was merely scheduling private time with the woman in a hotel suite in order to share with her the good news of Jesus Christ, as he had become acquainted with her and was very concerned that she was not a Christian.

“It is preposterous to assert that a virtuous believer like Mr. Trump would cheat on his beautiful wife so callously, and while their child was only months old,” a solemn Bakker said into the camera as colorful balloons provided a backdrop for some reason.

“He was so concerned with the eternal state of Miss Daniels’ soul that he scheduled some alone time with just the two of them, so he could share with her how Jesus Christ had changed his life and how He could also save her from her sins.”

Nearly choking up with tears, Bakker went on to explain how much he loves and looks up to Trump as a model saint.

“Our president even arranged through his attorney to give this woman $130,000 in an attempt to help rescue her from the destructive adult film industry and get her life back on track. What a man of God!”

The televangelist ended his broadcast by wagering that there were probably “many, many more” sex-industry workers like Daniels who could tell a similarly inspiring story about President Trump.

Gerson: Trump evangelicals have lost their gag reflex (GazetteXtralink): Billy Graham has been one of the most visible, respected and influential Christians in the world since the 1950s. But he often had a blind spot when it came to politics.

Graham was Richard Nixon’s golfing buddy and spiritual adviser. He was there to pray with Nixon after every victory and loss. And Nixon consulted him on everything from his vice presidential pick to the conduct of the Vietnam War.

It must have been a heady experience. “Nixon showed his friendliness to me in many personal ways,” Graham later recalled. “He came to our home on the mountain. He often referred to the pineapple tea my mother served him when he visited her. ... In our games of golf together, he was always willing to coach me. ... He remembered birthdays.” In Graham’s view, Nixon was “a modest and moral man with spiritual sensitivity.” He “held such noble standards of ethics and morality for the nation.”

Graham was in denial about Watergate until the last. When he finally read through the Watergate tape transcripts—including profanity, political corruption, lying, racism and sexism—Graham remembers becoming physically ill. He said later of Nixon: “I wonder whether I might have exaggerated his spirituality in my own mind.” Graham’s biographer William Martin quotes a close Graham associate who is more blunt: “For the life of me, I honestly believe that after all these years, Billy still has no idea of how badly Nixon snookered him.”

We can now look back on such gullibility with nostalgia. Billy Graham had the alibi of self-deception. But Franklin Graham, Jerry Falwell Jr., Robert Jeffress and Donald Trump’s other evangelical advocates have no such excuse. They have made their political bargain with open eyes.

Trump has made profanity an unavoidable part of our political culture. He is in the midst of a gathering corruption scandal that has left close aides under indictment. He tells repeated and obvious lies. He incites ethnic and racial resentment as a political strategy and was caught on tape bragging about sexual assault. Add to this something that could never be said of Nixon: The credible accusation that Trump paid hush money to a porn star to cover up an affair.


And what is Franklin Graham’s reaction? “We certainly don’t hold him up as the pastor of this nation and he is not. But I appreciate the fact that the president does have a concern for Christian values, he does have a concern to protect Christians whether it’s here at home or around the world, and I appreciate the fact that he protects religious liberty and freedom.”

“A concern for Christian values.” I imagine there is considerable presidential stroking behind such a pronouncement—the current equivalent of remembering birthdays and pineapple tea. But Graham’s argument is as crudely political as it gets. Since Trump has delivered the goods on protecting Christians, evangelicals should give him the benefit of every doubt on moral matters, even when such doubts are absurdly transparent ploys.

The level of cynicism here is startling. Some Christian leaders are surrendering the idea that character matters in public life in direct exchange for political benefits to Christians themselves. It is a political maneuver indistinguishable from those performed by business or union lobbyists every day. Only seedier. You scratch my back, I’ll wink at dehumanization and Stormy Daniels. The gag reflex is entirely gone.

From a purely political perspective, the Trump evangelicals are out of their depth. When presented with the binary choice of Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, I can understand a certain amount of anguish.

But that is not a reason to become sycophants, cheerleaders and enablers. Politics sometimes presents difficult choices. But that is not an excuse to be the most easily manipulated group in American politics.

The problem, however, runs deeper. Trump’s court evangelicals have become active participants in the moral deregulation of our political life. Never mind whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is of good repute.

Some evangelicals are busy erasing bright lines and destroying moral landmarks. In the process, they are associating evangelicalism with bigotry, selfishness and deception. They are playing a grubby political game for the highest of stakes: the reputation of their faith.

Not long after Watergate broke, a chastened Billy Graham addressed a conference in Switzerland, warning that an evangelist should be careful not “to identify the Gospel with any one particular political program or culture,” and adding, “this has been my own danger.” The danger endures.

Stormy Daniels Granted Official Status As First Pornstar (Breaking Burghlink): Adult actress Stormy Daniels is now to be officially known as First Pornstar, after a pro forma procedural vote was taken in both Houses of Congress today.

The title is a result of the invocation of the little-known 28th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which states: “A consort of the President who is a sex worker and not otherwise bound to him shall be known as First Concubine, or by whatever is the most appropriate parlance of the day.”

Though the role comes without a federal salary, Daniels can use the title when on tour, receive Secret Service protection, and, per local protocol, enjoy full diplomatic status anytime she visits France.

French President Emmanuel Macron was the first international leader to convey his nation’s congratulations: “We French have always had a relaxed attitude towards the infidelities of our leaders and mocked you Americans for being so uptight about it. But clearly you have relaxed. Boy how you have relaxed.”

Vladimir Putin also sent his best wishes directly to the First Pornstar:“I have enjoyed the tapes I have of you so much, just as I enjoy all my tapes featuring the current President of the United States.”

Mod: OK, so here's one thing that I am pretty certain about. Donald Trump is not what your mom and dad's might have called a conservative.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Not A Lot Of Enthusiasm Shown For Moving The Library At Last Night's YAC Forum

$
0
0
Where you will be able to both read and take a shower.
There were about 60 concerned folks in attendance at the big show, and most of them were of an age that many of us like to think of as that time when hoped for wisdom finally meets up with life's experiences. If only more people would just listen, how much better a place the world would be!

OK, sure. So where was I? Oh, Library Forum II. I think the best comment of the evening not surprisingly came from Gina Frierman-Hunt, who whipped up something along the lines of: "If you move the Library to Sierra Vista Park, it will become more conveniently located for Arcadia middle school students and dead people." It would be closer to the pool as well, so you'd be able to swim. Also where the Rose Parade float wiles away the days during its extensive down months.

This was officially a meeting for a couple of city commissions, so there was a little time set aside at the beginning for topics not on the agenda. One gentleman seized the moment and asked about an April ballot measure that will completely do away with the Utility User Tax. City Manager Gabe Engeland invited him to look at the city's Voter Guide for the response of those who would prefer that tax things stay the way they are. Which is just about everyone associated with the local government agency. Think of them as stakeholders.

Gabe Engeland commented that he had recently met with two residents on the tax question. One said that if taxes are raised he would have failed miserably at his job. The other one told him taxes must go up to save the Library. So how can a new City Manager win? Of course, I would have added that taxes had already been raised to save the Library, so why does it now need to be torn down? But then that would have been so 2016.

The Library Survey Postcard, which supplants the need for an actual and far too clear vote of the people, will be mailed out by its mysterious and remotely located Colorado creators within the next few days. There will be four questions there that will take your temperature about moving the Library. You will also be allowed to rate the mood of those answers on a scale 1 to 5 if you like. I will be making use of that here today.

There will also be some inquiries about your demographics, the results of which I am sure someone in the marketing field will find quite useful. I personally never answer those kinds of questions. Or sometimes I just make stuff up. A Zoroastrian eminence from Uzbekistan, perhaps. Age 26.

The attendees present then moved quickly on to the money issue. Something that I thought was rather moot since there are no architectural designs or building plans created yet for the proposed new location. Nor has the existing Library property been put on the market yet so, and as anyone who has ever sold a house will tell you, who really knows how much money the city is going to get?

This question did come up. Would there be enough money to make this all happen without jacking up taxes? Gabe threw some happy numbers out, but I am not sure that really eased the skepticism in the room. He also noted that most people are against a tax increase. Or at least those he has heard from. Please rate this observation from 1 to 5. With 5 being the highest number, and 1 being the lowest.

The Sierra Vista parking situation came up. A woman whose name I believe is Nancy was of the opinion that since the current Library is in the center of town, there are plenty of places to park a car. In the new proposed location things could get quite tight. Sierra Vista Park has tennis courts, basketball hoops, several baseball diamonds, a pool, a kiddy park, an interesting stand alone snack bar, a gym, a picnic area, a Rose Float barn, plus some other stuff. Throw in a Library and things could get complicated. Mark 5 if you agree, 1 if you'd prefer to ride a bike to get there.

Gabe added that we have work to do irregardless. Which is true. We all have clocks to punch.

Heather asked if it was the community that would be making the decision. The City Manager's answer was no, the City Council will be deciding that based on how the postcards are filled out. Of course, had there been a vote the community would be making the decision. However, the City Council decided that such a verdict might not be nuanced or flexible enough. Make sure you have your pencil ready. Mark 1 if you disagree, 5 if this was a moment of ecstatic peace for you.

A well turned out young man named Owen, who apparently was chosen to speak on behalf of the Foothill Village's youth, said if you build the new Library, the teenagers will come. Fitting for a Library located next to a baseball field. Hopefully they will be dropped off by their parents and therefore not require any parking.

Someone whose name I neglected to write down asked if the new Library would be able to provide the kinds of access the community needs. Gabe talked about the hard working $9,600 consultant and the space analysis he is doing. "Space is important,"Gabe said. According to Star Trek it is also the final frontier.

A gentleman named Bill, who was amongst the few there that actually wants to move the Library into the Community Recreation Center, said that we need "a Library for the 21st Century." He really did say that. And since taxes are too low to accomplish this futuristic imperative, imposing a $200 dollar a year parcel tax would be just the thing. Circle 1 if you don't think so, 5 if you'd be happy to cough that up. Mark down 2, 3 or 4 if you'd rather have been at Lucky Baldwin's hammering down a few highly fortified Belgian beers.

A guy named Rex had an idea I would have rated a 5, except for one problem. He suggested building the new Library where the current one now stands. But then how would you be able to sell the property in order to fund a new building? Also how would Andy Bencosme be able to make any commission? You know they wouldn't approve of that in Arcadia.

Someone asked if there was a reasonably good description of what the Library by the Pool would look like. Gabe said no. Such planning would cost money, and the city first wants to know what people want first. Judging by what I heard at this meeting Gabe could be waiting a long time for that. Mark 5 if you agree, 1 if you haven't formed your opinion yet.

A woman named Helen wanted to know what the costs are going to be. Gabe said costs are going up. I was not surprised to hear this. I'm going to put down a 5.

MaryAnn McGillivray, who I used to talk with often but not so much lately, said we'd be foolish to sell the Library property. Once sold it will be gone forever. She also said the city needs to adopt a Green Plan. Keep the open spaces and think things through a little more. Gabe countered by observing that Sierra Madre is difficult to develop, that the current library is not ADA compliant, you know, the usual rhythm.

That only gets a 1 from me. Just make the damn place ADA compliant and let's get past this already.

It was then asked what would be built on the Library property once it is sold to someone we're probably not going to like very much. Gabe said it is in the General Plan. I am pretty familiar with the General Plan, and I cannot recall seeing anything about building condos on the lot where the existing Library stands.

The last question I wrote down came from a thoughtful gentleman named Gary who said that the people of Sierra Madre should be able allowed to look at some bids on this project. You know, like how it is usually done. He suggested 3. Gabe said that can't be done. I would have asked why, but instead I marked down an empowering 1.

That's all I got. See you at the cyber cafe.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Decision 2018: Arcadia’s April Election Already Raising Some Eyebrows

$
0
0
Bulldozer Bob: Preservation is a government plot.
Mod: The two following articles from the Arcadia Weekly were forwarded to me by someone from Sierra Madre's neighbor to the east, and south. There were several comments included, which I am adding at the end of this post. So you know, I believe that the 2018 local elections will be the year the Empire attempts to strike back. The Realty/Development crowd have suffered some pretty significant defeats at the polls lately, both in Sierra Madre and Arcadia. They badly want back in, and are going to do anything they can to get there. The articles were written by Terry Miller.

Decision 2018: Arcadia’s April Election Already Raising Some Eyebrows (Arcadia Weeklylink): Elections are always fascinating and occasionally contentious, but when Arcadia Weekly learned that embattled and disgraced former council-member, John Wuo initially pulled papers to run for office again we thought this year’s would be a doozie.  Alas, he didn’t file, nor did Paul Van Fleet, who pulled papers in late December. Van Fleet was planning on running for ShoTay’s seat.

This election is for three seats: Members of the City Council for Districts 2, 3, and 5-(Full term of four (4) years). The nomination period began on Monday, December 18, 2017, at 7:30 a.m., and closed Friday, January 12, 2018, at 4:30 p.m.

If no one or only one person is nominated for an elective office, appointment to the elective office may be made as prescribed by Section 10229, of the Elections Code of the State of California. Two newcomers, Joyce Platt and Jolly Wu round out the more familiar names: Bob Harbicht; Tom Beck; Roger Chandler and Sho Tay.

According to candidate Tom Beck, “This election will be different from all previous Arcadia elections. In 2017 the Arcadia City Council voted 3-2 to go to ‘district elections’ instead of ‘at large elections’. I voted “NO” (as did Councilwoman Verlato) to this change. Only two districts, 2 & 5, will actually have a contested election this cycle. My district is 2 which generally is bordered by Orange Grove on the north, Michillinda on the west, Huntington on the south, and Santa Anita on the east.”

Bob Harbicht, who ran unsuccessfully in the last election, maintains that “private property rights have been under attack in Arcadia.  The latest government takeover of our property rights is the so-called “Historic Preservation Ordinance.”  This would allow government or your neighbors to declare your home a “historic resource” without your permission, thus severely limiting your ability to remodel, add onto, or modify it.  While protecting truly historic structures is admirable, there must be a limit on government infringement on our property rights,” Harbicht said.

Chandler: First elected in 1986. Wants more.
Newcomer Joyce Platt had 30 years teaching in the Arcadia Unified School District says, “Currently there is an expansion of new business areas and mixed-use areas being planned for the City of Arcadia, but along with the new development we need to look at our current business areas such as Baldwin Avenue and revitalize those areas and make them more client friendly.

I believe that the biggest challenge in the next four years is long-term financial sustainability.  This is becoming more difficult as it’s a function of what happens in the state legislature and what happens with the economy along with pension costs and unfunded liabilities.”

Jolly Wu moved to Arcadia 17 years ago and is a strong advocate “of equal opportunity for accessibility to the city council by advocating free roll out service from Waste Management for people with physical hardships. In the same year I participated in an effort to successfully rezone my neighborhood from R2 to R1 in order to prevent developers from constructing a huge apartment complex on 3rd Ave., Lee Ave., and Greenfield.”

In 2016 several senior citizens and Wu formed the Arcadia Transportation Taskforce to insure that Dial-A-Ride funding was properly used for seniors and disabled people only.  This led to introducing the option of transporting school children by professional well-trained school bus drivers to increase the safety of school children.  The Taskforce also advocated repairing uneven sidewalk in the business district on Foothill Blvd.  This prompted the city to repair several locations on Foothill Blvd.

Roger Chandler, who has a long history with Arcadia, is a former law enforcement leader who was first elected to office in 1986.  Chandler is a strong advocate to get more police officers on the beat in Arcadia. “We are being inundated with dangerous criminals preying on our neighborhoods. Early prison release won’t end; it’s up to us to protect ourselves. Our police have arrested more felons for residential burglary and street robberies in 2017 than in the past several years combined,” Chandler says.

Sho Tay, originally from Taiwan, is running unopposed as Van Fleet decided not to run at the eleventh hour.  Tay, has been very active in the Asian business community and like Chandler, has a background in law enforcement serving as a reserve officer for Alhambra PD. “I want to bring more attention to public safety by sponsoring a citywide program to install doorbell cameras and alarm systems. We will look at new technology to aid our law enforcement. And we need to preserve the special qualities that make Arcadia unique,” said Tay.

Sho Tay: The Happy Anointed
Who’s running against whom? (Arcadia Weekly link): There is a wee bit of confusion with Arcadia’s upcoming April municipal election, according to a couple of concerned readers about last week’s page one story said forthcoming vote.

Essentially, this is a two person race in two separate districts:

District 2: Tom Beck’s seat is being challenged by Bob Harbicht.

District 5: Roger Chandler’s seat on the dais is being challenged by Joyce Platt and Jolly Wu.

Residents in District 3, where Sho Tay has no opponent this year, will probably not receive a ballot as council will likely vote Thursday to save tax payers the burden of $14-15,000 for an uncontested seat in that district.

Because of the above facts, Section 10229 of the Elections Code allows the City Council to take one of the following courses of action:

- Appoint to the office the person(s) who has/have been nominated.

- Appoint to the office any eligible voter if no one has been nominated.

- Hold the election if either no one or only one person has been nominated.

At a special City Council meeting to be held on January 25, 2018, the City Council will consider whether to make an appointment and cancel the election for that office or direct an election to be held. The persons appointed, if any, shall qualify and take office and serve exactly as if elected at a municipal election for the office.

Comments from our friend in Arcadia

Thoughts about Arcadia's upcoming election:

First: It's a sad day when a public official who is expected to represent a population of 60,000 people gets appointed and doesn't have to run, because there is no one to run against him. Proto-developer Kin Hui of Singpoli, the contributor of $10,000 to Sho Tay's campaign in 2014, will be able to save his grease money for another campaign.

Second: Chandler wants to fix a problem by throwing taxpayer money at it. He wants to hire more police to fix the increase in burglaries, yet burglaries have gone down in Arcadia in the last six months without having to add a single officer to the department.

ThirdHarbicht wants to scare the hell out of the residents into voting for him. He fabricates a historic preservation ordinance that would take away everyone's property rights, unless he is elected to save the day.  He forgets to mention that he was one of the 3 votes that led to the demise of Anoakia, the home of Anita Baldwin.  I think it's fair to conclude, Harbicht does not think the history of Arcadia is important.  For someone who is running to represent Arcadia, I would think residents would want a person who values the history of the place he/she represents.

So if you are uninformed and you believe everything you read in a candidates' statement, you might vote for the 2 worst choices in Arcadia,  Harbicht and Chandler.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Daily Mail: Melania Trump has been spending nights at a posh D.C. Hotel since the president was accused of having a fling with porn star Stormy Daniels

$
0
0
Mod: So did Melania bug out on that trip to Davos due to her husband's now infamous fling(s) with porn star Stormy Daniels, or not? The media controversy continues to rage on. This inquiring mind wanted to know, and found the following reporting.

Melania Trump has been spending nights at a posh D.C. HOTEL since the president was accused of having a fling with porn star Stormy Daniels - before the first lady unexpectedly flew to Palm Beach (Daily Maillink): Melania Trump has spent a number of nights at a posh D.C. hotel away from President Trump following allegations of a fling with porn star Stormy Daniels, White House sources told DailyMail.com.

The first lady opted for time away from her husband since news of a possible $130,000 payoff from the President's lawyer to Daniels to cover up an alleged tryst was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Then, last week, to add insult to injury, a celebrity magazine published a cringe-worthy 2011 interview with Daniels in which she talked about the alleged 2006 sexual encounter with the future president in a hotel room at a casino in Lake Tahoe, Nevada following a celebrity charity golf tournament.

'It's been upsetting and humiliating; her relationship with President Trump has become strained,' a White House source told DailyMail.com.

Over two hours after DailyMail.com posted this story, Melania's  spokesperson, Stephanie Grisham, tweeted: The laundry list of salacious & flat-out false reporting about Mrs. Trump by tabloid publications & TV shows has seeped into "main stream media" reporting.'

She did not say specifically what, if  any, part of the DailyMail.com was 'false.'Grisham did not respond to several requests for comment from DailyMail.com regarding Melania's hotel stays, although given several days notice prior to publication.

Melania left Washington D.C. mid-day on Thursday for West Palm Beach, Florida, just as the president held court at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, an event the first lady was originally scheduled to attend.

Daniels, who has starred in movies such as 'Good Will Humping' and 'Operation Desert Stormy,' claimed she could intimately describe the president's manhood and even revealed sex positions they had enjoyed.

At the time, Melania would have been caring for her and Trump's four-month-old son Barron.

Sparking more rumors and speculation about the impact on their marriage, on Tuesday it was announced she would not be joining President Trump on his trip to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland as was originally planned.

East Wing communications director Stephanie Grisham confirmed to DailyMail.com that the first lady's decision to forgo the trip to Davos was based on 'scheduling and logistical issues,' as CNN reported.

Grisham had said the First Lady had intended to go to Davos as a show of support for her husband, who will deliver a speech at the forum.

But White House sources have told DailyMail.com that a memo sent to staffers also indicated the first lady was not expected to make any solo appearances while the President is away, drawing into question how her schedule is conflicted.

One well-placed source said: 'Melania spends three to four days a week away from the White House and has stayed at a hotel in D.C. multiple times in January, often for days at a time. She also travels up to New York.

'She rarely comes into his West Wing office as other first ladies have done and her schedule is vague at best.

'She seems to be avoiding duties unless there is a very special reason.

'Talk among staffers is that the Stormy Daniels affair hit her hard, it's been upsetting and humiliating and her relationship with President Trump has become strained.

Mod: The rest of this unhappy and shocking news can be read at the link. Melania's spokesperson is not happy with the Daily Mail's reporting on this controversy, and has now said so in a Tweet.

Melania spokeswoman blasts 'salacious' reports as 'fake news'(The Hilllink): A spokeswoman for first lady Melania Trump lashed out at the media for "tabloid" reporting that about she says has "seeped into 'main stream' reporting."

In a tweet Friday afternoon that did not mention a specific report, Trump's spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham accused news outlets of "salacious & false reporting," and referred to some outlets as "fake news."

"The laundry list of salacious & flat-out false reporting about Mrs. Trump by tabloid publications & TV shows has seeped into 'main stream media' reporting. She is focused on her family & role as FLOTUS - not the unrealistic scenarios being peddled daily by the fake news,"Grisham tweeted.

The tweet from Grisham came just hours after the United Kingdom-based Daily Mail published a report claiming the first lady was spending nights in a D.C. hotel following news reports alleging that President Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen arranged a $130,000 payment to a porn star for her silence concerning an affair with Trump.

The first lady originally planned to accompany her husband to Davos, Switzerland, this week for the World Economic Forum but instead remained behind.

Grisham told CNN on Monday that the change was made due to "scheduling and logistical issues."

Trump has not made a public statement since the publishing of The Wall Street Journal's report earlier this month that President Trump had an affair with adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2006, shortly after the birth of Barron Trump.

Mod: Whatever the truth here might be, Stormy Daniels has been cashing in on her recently revitalized career, and big time. Here is a Newsweek report many in the Trump administration were not happy to see.

Trump State Of The Union Risks Being Upstaged By Stormy Daniels Interview On Jimmy Kimmel (Newsweeklink): President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address will not be the only thing the world will be watching come January 30. Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel announced on Thursday that he will be interviewing adult film star Stormy Daniels right after Trump’s speech.

I am pleased to announce that the very gifted @StormyDaniels will be on #Kimmel Tuesday 1/30 after the #StateOfTheUnion. I have MANY QUESTIONS! #MAGA,” Kimmel tweeted Thursday night.

Daniels made the news earlier this month amid a wave of reports about Trump’s personal life before he entered the White House, including allegations that the two had a relationship. In a 2011 interview with In Touch Weekly that was not published until January 19, Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, said she was invited to Trump’s hotel room where they had sex. The alleged encounter happened four months after his wife, Melania, gave birth to their son, Barron.

The story first came to light in a report in The Wall Street Journal that Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen, gave Daniels a $130,000 payment to keep quiet about the 2006 sexual encounter less than a month before the 2016 election.

Mod: And now it looks like everybody wants to get in on the act. So to speak.

Trump Wanted A Threesome With Stormy Daniels, Porn Star Alana Evans Claims (Newsweeklink): Donald Trump was a reality-TV star and billionaire real estate mogul when he invited porn star Alana Evans to “hang out” with him and fellow adult-film starlet Stormy Daniels in July 2016, Evans claims in a newly released interview. She said she believed Trump was inviting her to have a threesome.

Evans told People she received a phone call from Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, when they were at Nevada’s Lake Tahoe for the American Century Celebrity Golf Championship almost 12 years ago. Evans previously told NBC’s Megyn Kelly earlier this month about Daniels asking her to “party” with her and Trump, but has now said she believed the future president was angling for a sexual escapade with both women.

“If my girlfriend calls me to hang out with another man, I expected it was for something naughty,” Evans said.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Fox False Flag: Sean Hannity Is Now a Favorite Weapon of Russian Trolls Attacking America

$
0
0
Mod: Fox News, the cable network that has for years proclaimed itself an essential outlet for those people who swear they love America more than everybody else, has apparently now become a favorite informational resource for Russian trolls keenly intent on undermining western democracy. And who do these fake newsers love to share more than anyone else? Why Sean Hannity, of course. What a surprise.

Sean Hannity Is Now a Favorite Weapon of Russian Trolls Attacking America (Mother Joneslink): Soon after Donald Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn agreed to a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller on Dec. 1, Kremlin-linked trolls began ramping up their social-media attacks on the Russia investigation. They tweeted out dozens of articles from Fox News and far-right outlets aimed at undermining the credibility of the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the so-called deep state. And Vladimir Putin’s trolls would soon have a new vein of material to exploit.

As Christmas approached, a drumbeat against the FBI grew louder in certain quarters of Congress: GOP Rep. Jim Jordan led the attack, claiming on Fox News that the FBI had conspired against Trump’s 2016 campaign. President Trump himself launched broadsides against FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and “leakin’ James Comey.” And on December 20, Fox News star Sean Hannity tweeted “CONSPIRACY: GOP Lawmakers Says FEDERAL CONSPIRACY to Prevent Trump Presidency.”

That day, Hannity’s website ranked among the top 10 shared by the network of Twitter accounts linked to Russian influence campaigns and tracked by the nonpartisan Alliance for Securing Democracy on its national security project, the Hamilton 68 dashboard. Hannity content had not registered much previously—but since December 20, links from Hannity’s site have appeared frequently on the dashboard, often ranking among the top 10. “It’s now up there with other top most-shared domains,” says Bret Schafer, an analyst who monitors the dashboard for the Alliance.

Another storm kicked up last week when House Republicans began calling for the release of a memo produced by Rep. Devin Nunes, purportedly alleging surveillance abuses by the FBI and the Justice Department in the Trump-Russia investigation. On January 18, Hannity inveighed against Mueller specifically: “I have a message tonight for the special counsel, Robert Mueller,” he said at the outset of his Fox News prime time report on the memo. “Your witch hunt is now over. Time to close the doors.” By the end of the following day, the hashtag #releasethememo had been tweeted about 3,700 times in 48 hours by the 600 accounts monitored on Hamilton 68, boosted in part by a tweet from WikiLeaks offering a reward for the memo. Hannity also posted “#releasethememo” to the top of Hannity.com.

The Washington Post reported Tuesday that House Freedom Caucus leaders including Rep. Jordan recently sought Trump’s blessing for their campaign to release the memo. While the White House said Trump didn’t endorse the release of the memo, GOP lawmakers believed the president signaled that he strongly favored it.

“I think it’s fair to infer with about a 99 percent probability that since it helps the president so much, that he would be happy if the public knows about it,” Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks told the Post. On Tuesday, as #releasethememo sat among the top hashtags of the Hamilton trending list for the fifth day in a row, senior congressional Democrats called on Twitter and Facebook executives Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg to investigate the extent of the Russian influence campaign happening on their platforms in real time.

“If these reports are accurate, we are witnessing an ongoing attack by the Russian government through Kremlin-linked social media actors directly acting to intervene and influence our democratic process,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Rep. Adam Schiff wrote to the tech leaders.

Former senior CIA official John Sipher says the smear campaign by Fox News and Trump’s allies in the House plays directly into Kremlin hands. “A weak FBI is in the Russian interest. They will use all the tools at their disposal to pile on and amplify the negative messages,” he told Mother Jones.

“At the very same time that we should be coming together to defend ourselves, partisan supporters of the president are attacking the institutions that are protecting us. There needs to be a level of trust and awareness that [FBI and DOJ] are working on behalf of the people, and are not partisan hacks. While it might be in the immediate, short-term interest of a few right-wing politicians, they are helping our enemies and risk doing long-term damage to our democracy.”

Since the Hamilton dashboard launched last August, Fox News in general has often appeared on the trolls’ most-shared list. “Anecdotally, Fox is the go-to news source for breaking news,” Schafer says. But the more recent Hannity links seized upon by the Russian trolls echo a deceptive style seen with content from far-right conspiracy sites like Gateway Pundit and True Pundit.

One recent example: a Hannity.com link headlined, “KNIVES OUT: Elizabeth Warren GOES AFTER Oprah Winfrey over 2020 run”—leading to a story quoting Warren as praising Winfrey for a “fabulous speech.” Another Hannity link shared by the trolls recently carried a headline claiming “Fusion GPS says FBI likely funded ‘Trump dossier’ author” and crediting BreitbartNews. The Hannity links shared this week continued to demand the release of the Nunes memo and hammered at the freshest conspiracy theory, the alleged disappearance of FBI officials’ allegedly biased text messages.

Hannity did not respond to a request for comment about his rising popularity among the network of Russian-linked accounts.

“Because Russian accounts promote a certain political position is not evidence of coordination” between the trolls and Trump partisans advocating for the release of the memo, Schafer notes. The key takeaway with #releasethememo, he says, “is that Kremlin-oriented trolls have used that hashtag to promote divisiveness, distrust, and to negatively influence our public discourse.”

Former FBI special agent Clint Watts pointed out Tuesday that attacks on the FBI have been increasing as the Russian investigation continues to accelerate. After reports Tuesday that Attorney General Jeff Sessions and James Comey had been interviewed by Mueller’s team, Watts tweeted: “Interviews are getting closer to the top & suddenly attacks by @GOP on FBI have increased.”

The 600 Kremlin-linked live Twitter accounts that Hamilton 68 monitors are separate from the 2,752 accounts Twitter revealed last fall that were operated before the 2016 presidential election by the Russian Internet Research Agency. Last Friday, Twitter updated that number to 3,814 IRA-linked accounts—plus more than 50,000 automated bot accounts linked to the Russian government. Twitter says it is sending emails to 677,000 users to notify them that they interacted with the Russian accounts.

Republican Sen. John Cornyn, who has been involved in the Trump-Russia investigation via the Judiciary Committee, called on Mueller in December to “clean house” of partisans. Cornyn tweeted Saturday that Twitter had notified him that he had shared content from or followed known Russian accounts.

“Finally social media is waking up to manipulation of public opinion by our adversaries,” he wrote. But he seemed to downplay the role of Congress: “All of us need to step up to meet this challenge,” he said, “especially the Press.”

Mod: Funny how so many of our loudest self-proclaimed patriots have turned out to be happily serving the interests of America's foreign enemies. And what is it that all of these false flag "patriots" are so keenly focused upon? Protecting Donald Trump. Ask yourself why.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

What Is So Transparent About City Hall's Transparency?

$
0
0
Ruthless social pressure on the matter of aspirin. 
Not to complain, because who would ever want to do that? However, meaningful input can sometimes be appreciated, especially by those who are making it. But if you are the recipient of that sort of thing? Not quite so much. Or at least that has often been my experience. Other people's ideas are rarely quite as satisfying as your own. What follows are mine.

A while back I exchanged a series of emails with Sierra Madre's City Manager about the Library Survey Postcard, which makes its appearance this week. Hopefully that is true and the long wait has finally come to an end. The cause of our correspondence was a comment that had been left on this blog a couple of times. Whoever made it was pretty persistent, so I figured I should finally follow up. This is what the commenter asked:

I get tired of asking but how many bids did the City get to bring the Library up to code? And, what is the amount of those bids. There has to be more than one bid to know anything at all. If it's just one bid how do we really know the truth?

All in all not a bad question. I forwarded this to the City Manager, and here is how he responded:

We’ve been asked this question a few times, here are the main elements which inform cost: electrical survey, engineering structural analysis, engineering and property condition assessment, ADA analysis and report, Library Facility Master Plan (this includes elements of ADA, accessibility, building condition, and structural analysis).

The estimate for bids will be different based on the how many projects we bid at once and which items are urgent and which can be phased in overtime. The estimate from the "Master Plan" report is $1.398 million.

Each of these should be available online in easy to access format soon.

I took that to mean the answer is no, and that there would only be one set of numbers, which are available as part of something something called the "Library Facilities Master Plan." That, along with a lot of other information (some of which IMHO is not quite as vital as those who wrote it had hoped it would be), can be found on the city's website under the somewhat loaded word "Transparency." You can get to that by clickinghere.

Now I would encourage you to go and read this stuff for yourself. Not only to get information you might or might not agree with, but also as a life lesson in how difficult transparency can often be. Rarely is information as clear or precise as we'd hoped, and there are reasons for that. Human fallibility being foremost amongst them. It is why God put erasers of pencils. Or, for that matter, also gave us matches.

It is also why basic information might be labeled "transparency." Not only because transparency defines a rational understanding of a situation, but also because in the end there is so very little of that in life. Then again, if this information was transparent, and only dealt with truth distilled down to its purest essence, how much would you need?

That said, and if you are pressed for time, here are most most essential numerical elements for the existing library. This is how much money the city would get if they sold that property. Either some of it, or all of it.


Here is how much you would have to spend to fix the current Library. Please note that if you sold both parcels of that property you would not be able to spend all of the money raised on the current Library. This is because the new property owner would likely bulldoze the place to make room for the luxury condominiums necessary to maximize his (or her) profits.


By "Minimal Investment" I am going to assume the Library solons actually meant to say "adequate repairs necessary to make the place compliant with safety and ADA requirements." Of course, this is not what they are so energetically trying to sell here, and that they acknowledged the place can be fixed at all must have caused them at least a little pain. Perhaps they need a Howard's aspirin.

So the good news is the "fix the current library" part is fairly transparent. Sell the back lot for $1.45 million and you'd have more than enough to make the place both safe and compliant with the many demands of a few dozen intrusive state and Federal bureaucracies.

I knew you'd be relieved to hear that. Even if it is the result of only one single bid, and with few opportunities for your questions, opinions or input.

Where things get rather non-transparent, and troubling, is with the lack of transparency on how much it is going to cost to turn the YAC into Sierra Madre's new Library by the Pool. And do you know why that is? I had no idea, so I asked the City Manager.

Tattler: Is there a similar "master plan" (or any kind of cost estimate) associated with moving the Library to the YAC and building on that additional space? I believe the reason I get asked this is some people are analytical. I think they're uncomfortable with the survey card which is more intuitive. I can see why the city would want to build a consensus before getting into the actual numbers, but I suspect you will get a number of "no move" results because some feel that without numbers they're being denied important information.

City Manager: The estimate(s) for the move will not be as in-depth as the Library Master Plan, but they do provide a good frame of reference for a range of what actual costs will be. In addition to the space and parking analysis we also know what the square footage cost for construction is and can use that to gauge what an addition/retrofit of the community center would cost. As you stated, we don’t want to put a lot of money into a plan to move if the community desires the library to stay at its current location.

The short answer here apparently is "No." Which unfortunately takes us back to one of our original questions. How can people be expected to share their opinions on that survey postcard if they first don't have all of the numbers upfront? Or at least one bid's worth of them?

You can't. At least not in an analytic and rational way. Of course, you could suspend all of that and go on just belief and emotion. Which is pretty much what you have been asked to do. Use the force, Luke.

But would that be "transparent?" As in "a rational and clear understanding of the situation?" Not all that much.

Meaningful Improvement

That is a term used above, and at first I was not quite certain what was meant by it. After some reflection, however, I have come to believe that what the Library Brain Trust is talking about here is space. Or, as they used to say on Star Trek, the final frontier.

Here is how the space controversy is described in a document called "What Are The Problems With The Current Library?" (link).

The current Library building was opened in 1955 and showcased a community room and even a movie projection closet! Just 5 years later the community room was turned into a children’s room to accommodate the burgeoning youth collection and programs. The lack of space has been keenly felt ever since. Attempts to extend the building or rebuild occurred in 1967, 1976, 1989, 1994, 1996, 2003- 2004, all failing from lack of funding. The only additions have been two small rooms at the front of the Library.

As mentioned in the Library Facility Master Plan, “lack of community space is the single largest hindrance to providing quality service. The Library contains no community rooms, no meeting space, no private study space, no open gathering space, and limited study areas. Library programs by default must take over the main reading room of the Library, displacing regular Library users. Even without programs, there is very little room for people. Conditions do not encourage quiet reading, study, or collaboration. Space constraints have put significant obstacles in the Library’s ability to update services.”

Alright. If space is what this is really all about, then maybe the problems are not quite as bad as some have suggested. We all have to deal with small inconveniences from time to time. I mean, if you don't like being at the library when a joyous round of Baby Rhyme Time is rocking the house, can't you just pack up your book and go read it at home? Put your feet up and pour a glass of wine, perhaps?

Is this space issue really worth the mostly unidentified expense and bother of razing the place and moving everything to an as yet largely unplanned and only partially constructed facility across town?

This week you will make your call.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

The Grammar Lady Is Not Happy With MENSA Member Andy Bencosme's Spelling And Grammar Deficiencies

$
0
0
I had a call from the Grammar Lady yesterday. She was in a bit of a panic about a spelling error on Andy Bencosme's City Council candidacy webpage. I have received these kinds of calls from her in the past, usually right around election time.

Normally I like to tell the Grammar Lady that we are all human, everyone makes mistakes once in a while, and isn't that why God put erasers on pencils? Besides, I am hardly perfect in this regard myself, so why would I want to throw those kinds of rocks around my glass house?

However, she countered my misgivings with a rather emphatic argument. Andy has made his membership in MENSA an important part of his election presentation, and therefore he should NEVER make spelling errors. Especially in his official campaign material. "There are certain standards involved," she let me know. I said I would look into it.

In case you are not aware, MENSA is an organization you might be permitted to join, but only if you can pass their test. One proving that you have an IQ high enough to number amongst so chosen and hallowed an elite. Here is how they describe this on MENSA's website (link):

Membership of Mensa is open to persons who have attained a score within the upper two percent of the general population on an approved intelligence test that has been properly administered and supervised.

In a world that often rewards achievement more than it does those who do well on tests, I am not certain there is any real value in this. But if you would like to be able to tell people how smart you are, and need the backing of an official organization to make that claim believable, you can go to the MENSA website and take a test. This won't immediately qualify you for any "I am really smart" lapel pins, but it will let you know if you stand a chance of ever becoming quite that annoying. Good luck, and please, no cribbing.

Andy has made his resume' available on-line (link), and here is the part where he discusses his MENSA membership. You might want to click on this to enlarge, especially if you are as blind as I am.


I just hope living in Monrovia isn't a qualification for MENSA membership. Should that be the case very few people reading this blog are going to qualify.

Andy also points out that MENSA credential on his campaign website.


Anyway, back to the Grammar Lady's points of informed concern. If you go to the Andy 4 Sierra Madre webpage (link), you will be able to read about the many things Andy really likes about Andy. Here is a passage that gives you some spice on his hopes and dreams. It is called "Why Andy."


I am sure Andy can say all of that, and more. I mean, who ever ran for City Council in Sierra Madre and didn't claim they could bring people together, make tough choices, and manage those tight budgets? And who doesn't love volunteers? People who are willing to work for no compensation other than the satisfaction of having done good deeds are always in high demand. What's not to like?

However, the Grammar Lady was not especially happy about that "I know how to be creative or and make the tough choices when needed" passage. "That makes no sense," she grumbled.

But where the ever vigilant Grammar Lady really got her straw and flowered hat into an unattractive shamble was over this ruby slipper. It is called "Issues."


"That is not how you spell 'priveleged' you know," pointed out the Grammar Lady in a heated huff. "You'd think Mr. Smartypants would want to go to Staples and buy himself a MENSA spellcheck."

I am not sure what I am supposed to do about this. I suppose I could turn Andy in to the MENSA Police and see if they'll revoke his membership. That is, if I remember their phone number. Or I could just post something here on The Tattler, and forget about it.

Wouldn't be the first time I've done that.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Associated Press Calls BS on Bogus Trump SOTU Claims

$
0
0
Mod: The following Associated Press report was liberated from an ABC News website. This morning the AP is calling Trump out on some of his most fraudulent claims, and we are certainly glad that they did. After all, the guy does lie like a rug, and people do need to be reminded of that often.

Checking the facts: Trump’s claims in his State of Union address (ABC News link): The AP is fact-checking remarks from President Donald Trump's State of the Union speech. Here's a look at some of the claims we've examined (quotations from the speech as delivered or as released by the White House before delivery):

WAGE GAINS
TRUMP: "After years and years of wage stagnation, we are finally seeing rising wages."

THE FACTS: Actually, they are not rising any faster than they have before. Average hourly pay rose 2.5 percent in 2017, slightly slower than the 2.9 percent increase recorded in 2016.

Most economists say wages should increase at a faster rate as the unemployment rate drops. The unemployment rate stands at a 17-year low of 4.1 percent, but that has done little so far to spark rising wages. The last time unemployment was this low, in the late 1990s, average hourly pay was rising at a 4 percent pace.

DIVERSITY VISAS
TRUMP: "The third pillar (of my immigration plan) ends the visa lottery — a program that randomly hands out green cards without any regard to skill, merit or the safety of our people."

THE FACTS: That's a highly misleading characterization. The program is not nearly that random and it does address skills, merit and safety.

The diversity visa program awards up to 50,000 green cards a year to people from underrepresented countries, largely in Africa. It requires applicants to have completed a high school education or have at least two years of experience in the last five years in a selection of fields identified by the Labor Department. Winners are then randomly selected by computer, from that pool of applicants who met the pre-conditions. Winners must submit to extensive background checks, just like any other immigrant.

COAL
TRUMP: "We have ended the war on beautiful clean coal."

THE FACTS: Coal is not clean. According to the Energy Department, more than 83 percent of all major air pollutants — sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, toxic mercury and dangerous soot particles — from power plants are from coal, even though coal makes up only 43 percent of the power generation. Power plants are the No. 1 source of those pollutants.

Coal produces nearly twice as much heat-trapping carbon dioxide per energy created as natural gas, the department says. In 2011, coal burning emitted more than 6 million tons of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides versus 430,000 tons from other energy sources combined.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
TRUMP: "The first pillar of our framework generously offers a path to citizenship for 1.8 million illegal immigrants who were brought here by their parents at a young age — that covers almost three times more people than the previous administration."

THE FACTS: Not so. The Obama administration pushed legal status for many more immigrants and was prevented by Congress and the courts from offering it. A 2013 bill that passed the Senate but died in the House would have bestowed legal status on about 8 million people, according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate.

In 2014, the Obama administration announced an expanded program that included parents of young immigrants who were shielded from deportation under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. According to the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute, the measure would have given legal status to up to 4 million people. The Supreme Court deadlocked on the plan, letting a lower court ruling stand that blocked it.

TERRORISTS
TRUMP: "In the past, we have foolishly released hundreds and hundreds of dangerous terrorists only to meet them again on the battlefield, including the ISIS leader, (Abu Bakr) al-Baghdadi, who we captured, who we had, who we released."

THE FACTS: Trump is correct that al-Baghdadi had been released after being detained at Abu Ghraib and Camp Bucca, U.S. detention facilities in Iraq. But Trump made his comment while announcing that he had signed an executive order to keep open the controversial U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. If he meant that "hundreds and hundreds" of Guantanamo detainees had been released only to return to the battlefield, his math is off.

The office of the Director of National Intelligence said this summer in its most recent report on the subject that of the 728 detainees who have been released from Guantanamo, 122 are "confirmed" and 90 are "suspected" of re-engaging in hostile activities.

MS-13
TRUMP: "We have sent thousands and thousands and thousands of MS-13 horrible people out of this country or into our prisons."

THE FACTS: That's an exaggeration and goes beyond how even how Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Trump administration's most aggressive anti-gang enforcer, characterizes the scope of the effort. Sessions said in a speech this week that federal authorities had secured the convictions of nearly 500 human traffickers and 1,200 gang members, "and worked with our international allies to arrest or charge more than 4,000 MS-13 members."

On other occasions, the attorney general has specifically said the 4,000 number reflects work done with "our partners in Central America." That suggests that at least some of the MS-13 members Trump is referring to weren't actually in the U.S when they were arrested, and aren't now in U.S. prisons.

OPIOIDS
TRUMP: Changes in immigration policies, including more border security, "will also support our response to the terrible crisis of opioid and drug addiction."

THE FACTS: Drugs being brought across borders are only part of the problem contributing to the nation's opioid crisis. According to the U.S. Centers on Disease Control and Prevention, about 40 percent of the opioid deaths in 2016 involved prescription painkillers. Those drugs are made by pharmaceutical companies. Some are abused by the people who have prescriptions; others are stolen and sold on the black market.

The flow of heroin into the U.S. from Mexico is a major problem, but drugs that are brought from other countries don't all come over land borders. Illicit versions of powerful synthetic opioids such as fentanyl, which are a major factor in rising overdose numbers, are being shipped directly to the U.S. from China.

TRUMP: "My administration is committed to fighting the drug epidemic and helping get treatment for those in need."

THE FACTS: The bipartisan National Governors Association doesn't think he's lived up to that commitment. Earlier this month, the governors called on Trump and Congress to do more to pay for and coordinate a response to the opioid epidemic.

The Trump administration has allowed states to begin allowing states to seek permission to use Medicaid to cover addiction treatment in larger facilities — a measure advocates say is needed.

VETERANS
TRUMP: "Last year, the Congress passed, and I signed, the landmark VA Accountability Act. Since its passage, my administration has already removed more than 1,500 VA employees who failed to give our veterans the care they deserve."

THE FACTS: This statement is inaccurate. It's true that more than 1,500 firings at the VA have occurred so far during the Trump administration. But more than 500 of those firings occurred from Jan. 20, when Trump took office, to late June, when the new accountability law began to take effect. That means roughly one-third of the 1,500 firings cannot be attributed to the new law.

Congress passed the legislation last June making it easier to fire VA employees and shortening the time employees have to challenge disciplinary actions. But the law's impact on improving accountability at the department remains unclear: More VA employees were fired in former President Barack Obama's last budget year, for instance, than in Trump's first.

BORDER SECURITY
TRUMP: "For decades, open borders have allowed drugs and gangs to pour into our most vulnerable communities."

THE FACTS: "Open borders" is an exaggeration. Border arrests, a useful if imperfect gauge of illegal crossings, have dropped sharply over the last decade. The government under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama roughly doubled the ranks of the Border Patrol, and Bush extended fencing to cover nearly one-third of the border during his final years in office.

The Obama administration deported more than 2 million immigrants during the eight years he was in office, more than in previous administrations. Studies over several years have found immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than people born in the United States.

FAMILY IMMIGRATION
TRUMP: "Under the current broken system, a single immigrant can bring in virtually unlimited numbers of distant relatives."

THE FACTS: It's not happening because the waiting list is so long. There is currently no wait for U.S. citizens to bring spouses, children under 21 and parents. But citizens must petition for siblings and adult children, and green-card card holders must do the same for spouses and children.

On Nov. 1, there were 4 million people in line for family-based visas, according to the State Department. The waits are longest for China, India, Mexico and the Philippines. In January, Mexican siblings of U.S. children who applied in November 1997 were getting called, a wait of more than 20 years. An immigrant could theoretically bring an uncle by bringing a parent who then brings his sibling, but the wait would be interminable for most.

OBAMA'S HEALTH LAW
TRUMP: "We repealed the core of the disastrous Obamacare — the individual mandate is now gone."

THE FACTS: No, it's not gone. It's going, in 2019. People who go without insurance this year are still subject to fines. Congress did repeal the unpopular requirement that most Americans carry insurance or risk a tax penalty but that takes effect next year.

It's a far cry from what Trump and the GOP-led Congress set out to do last year, which was to scrap most of the sweeping Obama-era health law and replace it with a Republican alternative. The GOP blueprint would have left millions more Americans uninsured, making it even more unpopular than "Obamacare." Other major parts of the overhaul remain in place, including its Medicaid expansion, protections for people with pre-existing conditions, guaranteed "essential" health benefits, and subsidized private health insurance for people with modest incomes.

AUTOS
TRUMP: "Many car companies are now building and expanding plants in the United States — something we have not seen for decades."

THE FACTS: He's wrong about recent decades. The auto industry has regularly been opening and expanding factories since before became president. Toyota opened its Mississippi factory in 2011. Hyundai's plant in Alabama dates to 2005. In 2010, Tesla fully acquired and updated an old factory to produce its electric vehicles.

Trump also declared that "Chrysler is moving a major plant from Mexico to Michigan." That's not exactly the case, either. Chrysler announced it will move production of heavy-duty pickup trucks from Mexico to Michigan, but the plant is not closing in Mexico. It will start producing other vehicles for global sales and no change in its workforce is anticipated.

ISLAMIC STATE
TRUMP: "Last year I pledged that we would work with our allies to extinguish ISIS from the face of the earth. One year later, I'm proud to report that the coalition to defeat ISIS has liberated almost 100 percent of the territory once held by these killers in Iraq and Syria. But there is much more work to be done. We will continue our fight until ISIS is defeated."

THE FACTS: Although it's true that the Islamic State has lost nearly 100 percent of the territory it held in Syria and Iraq when the U.S. began airstrikes in both countries in 2014, Syria remains wracked by civil war, with much of that country controlled by the government of Russian ally Syrian President Bashar Assad and not by U.S.-allied groups. The Iraqi government has declared itself fully liberated from IS.

The progress cited by Trump did not start with his presidency. The U.S.-led coalition recaptured much land, including several key cities in Iraq, before he took office. And the assault on Mosul, which was the extremists' main stronghold in northern Iraq, was begun during the Obama administration. But in the past year the counter-ISIS campaign has accelerated, based largely on the approach Trump inherited.

He's right that more remains to be done to eliminate IS as an extremist threat, even after it has been defeated militarily. The group is still able to inspire attacks in the West based on its ideology, and it is trying to make inroads in places like Afghanistan and Libya.

MIDDLE-CLASS TAXES
TRUMP: "Our massive tax cuts provide tremendous relief for the middle class and small businesses."

THE FACTS: That depends on how you define "tremendous." The biggest beneficiaries from the tax law are wealthy Americans and corporations. Most Americans will pay less in taxes this year. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center estimates that about 80 percent of U.S. households will get a tax cut, with about 15 percent seeing little change and 5 percent paying more.

Middle-class households — defined as those making between roughly $49,000 and $86,000 a year — will see their tax bills drop by about $930, the Tax Policy Center calculates. That will lift their after-tax incomes by 1.6 percent. The richest 1 percent, meanwhile, will save $51,140, lifting their after-tax incomes by 3.4 percent, or more than twice as much as the middle class.

ENERGY EXPORTS
TRUMP: "We are now an exporter of energy to the world."

THE FACTS: There's nothing new in that: The U.S. has long exported all sorts of energy, while importing even more. If Trump meant that the U.S. has become a net exporter of energy, he's rushing things along. The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that the U.S. will become a net energy exporter in the next decade, primarily because of a boom in oil and gas production that began before Trump's presidency. The Trump White House has predicted that could happen sooner, by 2020. But that's not "now."

TAX CUTS
TRUMP: "We enacted the biggest tax cuts and reform in American history."

THE FACTS: No truer now than in the countless other times he has said the same. The December tax overhaul ranks behind Ronald Reagan's in the early 1980s, post-World War II tax cuts and at least several more. An analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget in the fall put Trump's package as the eighth biggest since 1918. As a percentage of the total economy, Reagan's 1981 cut is the biggest followed by the 1945 rollback of taxes that financed World War II.

Valued at $1.5 trillion over 10 years, the plan is indeed large and expensive. But it's much smaller than originally intended. Back in the spring, it was shaping up as a $5.5 trillion package. Even then it would have only been the third largest since 1940 as a share of gross domestic product.

WORKER BONUSES
TRUMP: "Since we passed tax cuts, roughly 3 million workers have already gotten tax cut bonuses — many of them thousands of dollars per worker."

THE FACTS: This appears to be true, but may not be as impressive as it sounds. According to a tally of public announcements by Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative group that supported the tax law, about 3 million workers have gotten bonuses, raises or larger payments to their retirement accounts since the tax law was signed. That's about 2 percent of the more than 154 million Americans with jobs. The Labor Department said before the tax package was signed into law that 38 percent of workers would likely get some form of bonus in 2017.

Few companies have granted across-the-board pay raises, which Trump and GOP leaders promised would result from the cut in corporate tax rates included in the overhaul. Many, such as Walmart and BB&T Bank, said they will raise their minimum wages. Walmart made similar announcements in 2015 and 2016.

ENERGY PRODUCTION
TRUMP: "We have ended the war on American energy - and we have ended the war on clean coal."

THE FACTS: Energy production was unleashed in past administrations, particularly Barack Obama's, making accusations of a "war on energy" hard to sustain. Advances in hydraulic fracturing before Trump became president made it economical to tap vast reserves of natural gas. Oil production also greatly increased, reducing imports.

Before the 2016 presidential election, the U.S. for the first time in decades was getting more energy domestically than it imports. Before Obama, George W. Bush was no adversary of the energy industry. One of Trump's consequential actions as president on this front was to approve the Keystone XL pipeline — a source of foreign oil, from Canada.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Pasadena Now: Federal Lawsuit Against Pasadena Filed in Christopher Ballew Case

$
0
0










Mod: It looks like the inevitable has now occurred, and in the end the only people that are going to be punished in the Rotten Rose's latest lurid police brutality scandal are taxpayers. Folks who are going to be forced to cover what will likely be an immense settlement. Everybody else gets off, including the cops, politicians and city officials responsible. This is how corruption works, and why such occurrences continue. All the usual asses are now being covered. Kudos to Pasadena Now for staying with this story.

Federal Lawsuit Against Pasadena Filed in Christopher Ballew Case - Suit names City, Mayor, City Manager, Police Chief and numerous Officers as defendants, charges battery, false arrest and imprisonment (Pasadena Nowlink): Pasadena civil rights attorney John Burton filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Pasadena last Friday on behalf of motorist Christopher Ballew, who suffered multiple injuries, including a broken leg, during a violent traffic stop by Pasadena police in November of 2017. Ballew was arrested but the District Attorney declined to file any charges against him.

The lawsuit, filed January 26 in U.S. District Court, names the City of Pasadena, the Pasadena Police Department, Mayor Terry Tornek, City Manager Steve Mermell, Chief Of Police Phillip A. [sic] Sanchez, and Pasadena Police Officers Zachary Lujan and Lerry Esparza among the defendants, and charges violations of the California Civil Code, including battery, false arrest and imprisonment.

Burton is seeking a jury trial for the case.

Ballew’s original December, 2017 claim against the City, a legal step necessary before filing Superior Court lawsuits but not federal ones, was rejected by the City on Jan 5.

City of Pasadena spokesperson William Boyer confirmed late Tuesday that the City had been served with the lawsuit on Monday, and was in possession of it. However, since the case is now pending litigation, Boyer said he was unable to comment further.

Cellphone video of the arrest of Ballew, 21, swept across news media in December and ultimately was seen millions of times around the globe. The graphic images of what some activists have described as a Rodney King-like beating of the young black Altadenan galvanized protests at City meetings.

The City responded to declare that an active investigation into the incident is underway, and the two officers remain on duty.

Video linkhere.

Mod: The rest of this article is available at the link. Pasadena Now also posted an opinion piece by Skip Hickambottom and Dale Gronemeier, both of whom are Pasadena based civil rights attorneys. They question Pasadena's internal review policy, something that apparently only protects the guilty parties. What follows below is a truncated version of their observations. For the entire opinion piece follow the link. 

The Hat cannot comment at this time.
Can the Pasadena Police Administration Do an Honest Investigation of the Ballew Beating? (Pasadena Nowlink): The November 9 Chris Ballew beating is giving the Pasadena Police Department its widest-ever black eye. For example, a video that shows PD officers Esparza and Lujan mercilessly beating the young black man and which intersperses video of both of us speaking to the City Council about the brutality has now been viewed over two million times. (We played no role in its production or distribution). Another video prepared by John Burton, Ballew’s attorney, has also gone viral.

Ballew’s baton beating follows on the heels of black eyes for the Pasadena PD from its killing three other young Black men – LeRoy Barnes, Kendrec McDade, and Reginald Thomas. In each of those prior instances, the City hired independent reviewers to participate in the internal review. The recommendations of the OIR Group (Office of Independent Review) in the Barnes case was largely accepted and implemented. However, the OIR Group’s participation in the internal review of the McDade case was prevented by the police administration.

While the City hired independent reviewers who evaluated the Department’s conduct in the Barnes, McDade, and Thomas cases, it has not done so for the Ballew beating – despite the fact that the PD’s misconduct in the Ballew case has resulted in universal condemnation from a far larger audience. When the coalition of Pasadena and Altadena organizations protesting the Ballew beating have called for an independent reviewer, the police administration has responded by saying it is being internally reviewed and by ignoring their demand for outside review.

We submit that the public cannot rely on the integrity of a solely-internal review and that the police administration is shooting itself in the foot by refusing to recognize its problems with a solely-internal review.

Liability limitation and reputation protection – the inherent conflicts for a solely internal investigation

An internal investigation of the Ballew beating is essential, but it is not enough. The PD, like any organization, cannot be a learning organization that avoids repetition of prior mistakes unless it investigates itself. The problem is that the PD’s institutional imperative to honestly review its conduct conflicts with its imperatives to limit its liability and to protect its reputation.

Police brutality cases can get high-dollar awards for victims or survivors; the police administration’s imperative to investigate itself gets watered down by its tendency to deny wrong-doing that might lead to higher awards. Police administrators and unions want to protect police reputations; honest self-criticism that gets into the public domain is often hostilely viewed as self-damage to their reputation.

What, me worry?
The City Manager and his staff sacrifice truth to limit liability and protect the PD reputation

The record of public statements by the Pasadena police administration – City Manager Steve Mermell, Chief Sanchez who reports to him, and the PD command staff – inspires no confidence that it will engage in honest self-criticism rather than acting dishonestly to limit liability and protect the Pasadena PD’s reputation. Rather, the police administration has put out an inaccurate account and tried to justify the officers’ misconduct.

Presumably, the PD command staff reviewed the PD’s car-cam video and Lujan’s bodycam video of the beating before Lt. William Grisafe made the statement that Pasadena Now reported the day after the beating that “Ballew refused to comply with their orders and during a scuffle with police, he was able to get the baton of one of the officers. A fight ensued, and he ran.”

The PD’s videos show that the statement is inaccurate in asserting that Ballew ran and that he refused to follow the officers’ orders. The account relayed by Grisafe is misleading by failing to acknowledge that Ballew got the baton only in self-defense after the officers began beating him without justification.

The police administration’s insistence on solely internal review will be a self-inflicted wound

A solely-internal investigation of the Ballew beating is not only bad institutional policy but is also likely to be counter-productive for the police administration. The genie is out of the bottle on the Ballew baton beating because of the widespread revulsion of an enormous public that has viewed the videos.

The police administration’s track record to date ensures that their internal investigation will be viewed with jaundiced eyes. The police administration is on track for withering doubt about their investigation and are painting themselves into a no-win situation. External reviewers like the OIR Group are experienced former prosecutors or former police administrators whose expertise lead them to give credit where credit is due and blame where blame is due.

Further justifications for the officers’ conduct by the police administration will be eaten alive by the worm of doubt and will be seen as self-serving. In the long run, the institution will be better served and the police administration will get less blame if it hires an external reviewer to complement the internal review.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Your Library Survey Card Should Have Arrived By Now

$
0
0

The long wait is over. Or at least it ought to be. If you haven't received anything yet you might want to call City Hall and let them know you didn't get a Library survey card. It is yellow and looks like the photo of an actual card we posted above.

A number of people I know took pictures of their Library survey cards and sent them here as proof that they had received their copies. One resident also included the following observation with their email:

I'm going to mail ours back with a couple of notes attached. Can't make a decision without the $$$$ facts.

It is a good point. This is an important transparency issue that has been discussed here often, and by a number of commenters. It was also raised by folks at both of the well-attended Library Forums. The question being how can you give informed answers on this matter without first knowing what the costs associated with relocating the Library are going to be?

Some of the most important facts were never supplied by the city, which will make giving accurate answers problematic for many. It also raises questions about why cost issues were left out of this rather lengthy process. Were those who favor moving forward with the Library project fearful such information would convince people that this is a luxury an already heavily indebted city cannot afford?

After all, that some of the individuals responsible for adding to Sierra Madre's already radical financial challenges (One Carter lawsuits, millions of dollars in water bond debt) are also behind this project can be problematic. Their efforts to sell off the Library property and move everything somewhere near the Arcadia border, and without any financial reporting on how this is to actually get done, has made some functioning adults understandably uneasy.

You might also want to jot something about this on the address side of your card before you post it off to Colorado. Of course, being from so remote a locale they might not actually care, so perhaps you should also send a photocopy of your observations to City Hall and let them know, too.

It's a lot like being asked to buy a car without first knowing what the monthly payments are going to be. You can't always go with just the color, leather appointments, or how it makes you feel.

Here is a question that was emailed here to Tattler World HQ by another reader.

I don't see a mail-in deadline on the survey ... do you?

Here are the instructions that came along with the Library survey card. And as far as I can tell our commenter has asked a very good question. There is no deadline info supplied.


I am going to assume that you should send your Library survey card back sooner rather than any later. But a date would have been comforting to those who might want to take a minute and think this all over. Or procrastinate.

I have sent a note to the City Manager asking that question and I'll share with you whatever answer I get on mailing deadlines.

If you think it is a good idea you can also let everyone know how you answered the questions on your card by posting something about it here. This might help those who are having difficulty making their decisions.

If you have any questions let me know and I will forward them to the City Manager. I'll them post the answers in the comments section today once I've received them.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

The Borowitz Report: Former Hippies Put in Horrible Position of Rooting for the F.B.I.

$
0
0
Mod: I was going to post something about the ridiculously inane Nunes Memo today, but that fruit basket fell apart so quickly there really is no point. So instead we are turning to the always incisive Borowitz Report for the latest news on one of the stranger political alliances in some time. 

Former Hippies Put in Horrible Position of Rooting for the F.B.I. (The New Yorkerlink): WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Former hippies across the United States have been put in the unbearable position of rooting for the F.B.I., hippies have confirmed. From Vermont to California, erstwhile hippies bemoaned a nightmare scenario that has forced them to side with a law-enforcement agency they have despised since the Summer of Love.

“I always dreamed I’d spend my retirement surrounded by my grandchildren, telling them that the F.B.I. were fascist pigs,” Carol Foyler, a former hippie who lives in Santa Cruz, said. “That dream has been shot to hell.”

Her husband, Mick, nodded his head in sad agreement. “We were so happy when pot was legalized in California,” he said. “But the fact that we’re now on the same side as the F.B.I. has ruined even that.”

Now in their seventies, the Foylers are spending their days doing things they never dreamed possible when they traipsed through the mud at Woodstock: going door to door in Santa Cruz, asking other former freaks to sign a pro-F.B.I. petition.

Donald Trump has wrecked America’s standing around the world, spread misogyny and bigotry, ravaged the environment, and endorsed a child molester,” Carol said. “But making people like us support the F.B.I. is the most unforgivable thing he’s done.”

Mod: That is far out. But what follows is a really harsh toke.

The Dow plummets 666 points as stock market caps off worst week in two years (New York Daily News link): The Dow Jones took a devilish dive Friday. The index plummeted 666 points, capping off its worst week in two years.

The 2.5% drop — the largest points plunge since the 2008 recession — came after several American business behemoths, including Exxon Mobil and Google's parent company Alphabet, reported weak earnings.

Investors have recently grown concerned that a rapid rise in interest rates, exacerbated by higher inflation, could derail the market's otherwise steady upswing. They have also worried that the Federal Reserve would respond to the rising inflation by hiking interest rates quicker than expected.

Those predictions appeared to materialize Friday, with the 10-year Treasury note, a benchmark for many kinds of loans, including mortgages, climbing to 2.85%, the highest in about four years.

Mod: That could explain the unseasonably warm weather we've been having.

You might want to throw this guy Janz a couple of bucks

Clickhere for video.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

The U.S. Government Is Set To Borrow Nearly $1 Trillion This Year, An 84 Percent Jump From Last Year

$
0
0
Mod: The GOP likes to claim it is the party of fiscal responsibility, and that without them the country would sink into financial ruin. Apparently nothing could be farther from the truth.

The U.S. government is set to borrow nearly $1 trillion this year, an 84 percent jump from last year (MSN.comlink): It was another crazy news week, so it's understandable if you missed a small but important announcement from the Treasury Department: The federal government is on track to borrow nearly $1 trillion this fiscal year — Trump's first full year in charge of the budget. That's almost double what the government borrowed in fiscal year 2017.

Here are the exact figures: The U.S. Treasury expects to borrow $955 billion this fiscal year, according to a documents released Wednesday. It's the highest amount of borrowing in six years, and a big jump from the $519 billion the federal government borrowed last year.

Treasury mainly attributed the increase to the “fiscal outlook.” The Congressional Budget Office was more blunt. In a report this week, the CBO said tax receipts are going to be lower because of the new tax law.

The uptick in borrowing is yet another complication in the heated debates in Congress over whether to spend more money on infrastructure, the military, disaster relief and other domestic programs. The deficit is already up significantly, even before Congress allots more money to any of these areas.

“We're addicted to debt,” says Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. He blames both parties for the situation.

What's particularly jarring is this is the first time borrowing has jumped this much (as a share of GDP) in a non-recession time since Ronald Reagan was president, says Ernie Tedeschi, a former senior adviser to the U.S. Treasury who is now head of fiscal analysis at Evercore ISI. Under Reagan, borrowing spiked because of a buildup in the military, something Trump is advocating again.


Paul Ryan deletes tweet about tax cuts after Twitter backlash (CNNlink): House Speaker Paul Ryan deleted a tweet Saturday touting the GOP tax overhaul after critics called him out for appearing out of touch with the reality of low-income individuals' financial situations.

The tweet shared the story of a secretary who, according to a report by the Associated Press, was pleasantly surprised her pay went up $1.50 a week. "A secretary at a public high school in Lancaster, PA, said she was pleasantly surprised her pay went up $1.50 a week ... she said [that] will more than cover her Costco membership for the year,"Ryan tweeted with a link to the full article.

Jon Favreau, a former Obama staffer, tweeted: "As a thank you for passing a $1 trillion corporate tax cut, Paul Ryan received $500,000 in campaign contributions from the Koch brothers, which would probably cover the cost of buying a Costco."

"Remember, if you don't think benefits like an extra $1.50 a week and free Hostess snacks are good enough, you're the one who's out of touch," he added.

Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minnesota, also tweeted a link to the since-deleted Ryan tweet, writing: "Wells Fargo, fresh off of defrauding millions of Americans, gets $3.4 billion."

California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom tweeted with a screen shot of Ryan's tweet: "Guess someone told Paul Ryan you shouldn't go around praising yourself for giving a working person an extra $1.50 a week — because he deleted this tweet."

Mod: So where are you going to spend your buck fifty?

Nunes could face obstruction charges: Expert says colluding with White House nullifies congressional immunity (Raw Story link): Former White House ethics counsel Norm Eisen warned on Wednesday that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) may have opened himself up to obstruction of justice charges if he colluded with the White House to create a memo smearing the FBI’s Russia investigation. The Daily Beast reported this week that Nunes has refused to deny that he worked with White House staffers while writing an allegedly misleading memo suggesting that the Justice Department acted improperly when it extended surveillance of former Trump campaign staffer Carter Page, who was thought to be a foreign agent.

“Whoa,” Eisen wrote on Wednesday. “Nunes’s speech and debate clause Congressional immunity may not protect him from liability for conduct outside Congress.”

He added: “Depending on the facts, Nunes may have put himself in middle of a conspiracy to obstruct justice. He better beware: There are no secrets in this White House.”

Just for Men


sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Los Angeles County Office of Education Says Pasadena Unified at Risk of Insolvency - Where is Larry Torres?

$
0
0
Keeping a low profile?
Mod: You might be wondering where Sierra Madre's Board of Ed seat warmer Larry Torres has been lately. Especially after you've read this following news report from Pasadena Now.

County Office of Education Says Pasadena Unified at Risk of Insolvency, Requires Fiscal Stabilization Plan by February 26 (Pasadena Now link): Saying it is very concerned by the Pasadena Unified School District’s level of deficit spending and the District’s fiscal solvency, the Los Angeles County Office of Education put District on notice it has until February 26 to submit and get Board approval of a Fiscal Stabilization Plan. In a six-page letter to School Board President Roy Boulghourjian dated January 19, Dr. Candi Clark, the County Office of Education Chief Financial Officer, said that Pasadena Unified has placed itself “in immediate risk of becoming insolvent.”

Clark said the District’s spending has so exceeded plans that the District no longer meets the state-required minimum reserve funds level for the current school year.

As a result of that “negative certification,” Clark wrote, “the district must take immediate steps to restore the current year REU [Reserve for Economic Uncertainties] to the state required minimum level.” Clark said the Los Angeles County Office of Education will be placing a fiscal expert at the District, at the expense of the County office, to assist in the development and implementation of the Fiscal Stabilization Plan.

The County Office of Education, Clark wrote, is prepared to elevate the fiscal expert to an advisor with stay and rescind authority if the District does not make satisfactory progress. 

Here is a portion of that letter:
  
For the entire thing click here.
    
"Spending has so exceeded plans." I think that is the nicest way possible of saying PUSD administrators have been doing things like shoveling your kids' education money to the employee unions who funded the winning election campaigns of certain recent Board of Education candidates. Near legendary educators such as Larry Torres, Pat Cahalan and Roy"Boogie BoyBoulghourjian easily come to mind.

No cuts, no financial restraint, just quietly run the place into the ground while keeping campaign donors fat and happy. Just like we said they would.

If you are unfamiliar with the term "stay and rescind authority," it means that either Los Angeles County or Sacramento would take control of the PUSD, neuter the Board of Ed and its hired administrative staff, and run the place themselves. Here is how that quite possible event is described on the state's Legislative Analyst's Office website (link).

Educators.
If District Cannot Meet Obligations, State Provides Emergency Loan and Takes Administrative Control. When a school district is unable to meet its financial obligations, the state provides it with an emergency General Fund loan. The school district then works with the state's Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to issue bonds to repay the initial state loan. The district is responsible for paying the debt service and issuance costs of the loan as well as the salaries of various employees hired to provide administrative assistance to the district. From a governance perspective, the state Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) assumes all of the duties and powers of the local board and appoints a state administrator to act on his or her behalf. The primary goal of the state administrator is to restore the fiscal solvency of the school district as soon as possible. When the SPI and state administrator determine that the district meets certain performance standards and is likely to comply with its recovery plan, the local governing board regains control of the district and the state administrator departs. Until the loan is repaid in full, a state trustee with stay and rescind powers is assigned to oversee the district. 

I'm sure the PUSD Board of Education isn't all that upset about any state takeover. It would certainly mean a lot less work for them to do. Just as long as they get to keep their free health care.

So where exactly is Low Energy Larry these days? You'd think the prospect of the PUSD rapidly careening into a state of financial collapse would cause him to saddle up his unicorn and warn the good people of Sierra Madre that their kids might not have any schools to go to soon. Right?

Will Larry be speaking to the City Council soon about this matter? Hosting a Lunch & Learn at the Hart Park House? Going door to door to speak personally with concerned parents? That doesn't appear to be the case.

Has anybody seen this topic on any meeting agendas? Nothing I've seen would indicate that Larry has said a single word about this crisis to anyone. He has chosen to remain silent.

But look, it's not like you weren't told this could happen.

Clickhere for the warning you ignored.

My guess is Larry, along with the rest of the PUSD Board of Ed, is patiently waiting for someone in Sacramento to step in and bail them out. I'm sure the part about a state requirement to issue bonds probably appeals to them in a special way. My bet is they're already filling out the paperwork.

But what if the state doesn't go for that? Rather they decide to just fold the entire mess into the LAUSD? That would make sense. Why pay millions of extra dollars in administrative PUSD salaries and pensions when you don't have to? Why sustain so ineffectual a Board of Education? Just fire the whole bunch for rank incompetence and use the money to do something radical.

Like buy school books.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Arcadia City Council Candidate Bulldozer Bob Harbicht Wants You To Stay Off His Lawn

$
0
0
BobBulldozerHarbicht mailed out his first piece of campaign literature last week. It was full of nonsense and strange whinging. He does not play the victim well. Throw in a little paranoia and a few random delusional inferences, and you have a very strange brew. One that is hardly palatable. Trust me, you are going to want to stay off his lawn.

Bob seems all too quick to forget what really happened in the last election, and exactly why he lost. He claims “a group of people – most of whom do not even live in District 2” have a moral compass that is broken. “These people put out mailers, hand-outs and phone calls about me based on innuendo, half-truths and outright lies.” Yes, he did say that.

No one is exactly sure what “lies” the Bobster is referring to here. What most remember here is the proven fact that certain interested developers contributed tens of thousands of dollars to his disastrous 2016 campaign. Those developers certainly didn’t live in District 2.

In fact, most didn’t even live in Arcadia. Jeff Lee, a developer that personally shelled out $26,000, had a project pending in the Highlands for a new hillside development that would have required 350 truck loads of dirt to be excavated and removed.

To paraphrase a more famous politician, it takes a Bulldozer.

Perhaps what Bulldozer Bob is referring to here are certain embarrassing facts. Such as news about his past voting record against any curbs on predatory development. Bob campaigned against any kind of limit to the size of McMansions, claiming it would destroy property values in Arcadia. Yet certain sensible guidelines were put into place, and property values did not crash.


If he is so worried about “outsiders” influencing the election of District 2, why then does he have his yard signs posted at the corner of Oakwood and Sycamore, which is in District 1? Could it be because that’s the home of Real Estate Agent to the Developers, Ash Rizk? Which, by the way, is being demolished to make room for a sweet new McMansion.

Note on the Harbicht sign the legend, “Experience and Know How.” I guess that’s the kind of experience Bob is fine and dandy with.

Bob claims in his mailing that he wants to run a “clean campaign” based on “the issues” and “qualifications,” So let’s look at the issues Bulldozer Bob wants to limit the conversation to:

1) Crime in Arcadia– This is a problem throughout California. It’s not something unique to Arcadia. It’s not something City Hall can control other than to give direction to the police department to do something. Unless Bob can put on a red cape with a big "S" on it and fly through the air, all he will do is pay us the usual lip service.

2) Property Rights– “The so-called ‘Historic Preservation Ordinance.' If your home is over 50 years old it would allow government or your neighbors to declare your home a ‘historic resource’ without your permission, thus severely limiting your ability to remodel, add onto, or modify it.”

Unfortunately for Bob, this is an entirely inaccurate statement. Some might even go so far as to call it a fib. Identifying a home as a historic resource does nothing. Bob apparently didn’t pay much attention at the Historic Preservation outreach meetings. Maybe he took a nap. Or went out into the lobby to try on some funny and interesting hats.

A Historic Resource Survey has already been done identifying potential resources. This list is used if a Historic Preservation Ordinance is adopted in order to assist homeowners is determining whether or not they have a chance to be designated as historic should they apply. It is not based solely on the age of the home.

Only 124 individual historic residential resources were identified in the city of Arcadia. This in a city of over 16,000 residences. Do the math. That means there are about 15,876 residences that will never qualify for designation, even if a neighbor tries. And no ordinance has been proposed that will limit anyone’s ability to remodel, add onto, or modify their home.

As usual, Bob’s campaign rhetoric is complete political bull-pucky. Designed to bamboozle the naive, the gullible, easily agitated, or kinda cracked.

3)  Calm, knowledgeable, long-term decision making– You mean the kind of long-term decision making that saddled the city with $130 million of debt, with unfunded pension liabilities that were voted into existence by Bob way back in the 1990’s? If that is The Bulldozer's idea of long-term thinking, then maybe it's time to put term limits on it.

The City of Arcadia is about to go into financial cardiac arrest due to Bob’s long-term thinking.  Pension costs are running the city of Arcadia $7.5 million big ones per year, and are projected to increase to $14 million a year by 2023. Is Bob going to pay for any of that? Or get his McMansion developer pals to dig deep into their pockets and take care of it? Just like they do for his near-limitless campaign expenditures?

Where is the City of Arcadia going to come up with an extra $7 million each year on top of the on-going annual salary increases demanded by the public employee unions, ie the Arcadia Police Officer’s Association. Does Bulldozer Bob Harbicht have Golden Pension Fairies flying around in his belfry? Or are they just bats?

And what about his qualifications? Bob has a long list of charities that he volunteered for. While honorable, it’s not government. But he does have over 20 long years on the City Council. Two entire decades. Not just in Arcadia, but over in Duarte, as well. Talk about your outsider.

Take a look around, Arcadia. Look at what a couple of decades of Bulldozer Bob has gotten you. An underdeveloped commercial district, and an overdeveloped residential zone. And debt as far as the human eye can see.

You almost have to feel sorry for old Bulldozer. He’s obviously lost touch with reality.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Is Not Applauding For Dear Donald An Act Of 'Treason?'

$
0
0
Mod: Obviously Trump is a thin-skinned old dude who doesn't handle criticism very well. He can be a little sensitive at times. But accusing people who don't applaud his speeches of treason? That might be taking things a little far. Here is how the Pulitzer Prize winning website PolitiFact deals with our snowflake POTUS's latest flame out.

Donald Trump's Pants on Fire claim about 'treason'(PolitiFact.comlink): President Donald Trump’s visit to the Sheffer Corp. near Cincinnati was billed as a chance to discuss the recently enacted tax law. While Trump did discuss the tax law, most coverage of the speech led with a digression in which Trump accused Democrats of treason.

It came as Trump was touting a drop in African-American unemployment, as he had done on several occasions previously. He knocked Democrats for their failure to applaud when he mentioned this during his State of the Union address.

"You’re up there, you’ve got half the room going totally crazy, wild — they loved everything, they want to do something great for our country,"Trump said on Feb. 5. "And you have the other side, even on positive news — really positive news, like that — they were like death and un-American.  Un-American. Somebody said, ‘treasonous.’ I mean, yeah, I guess, why not? Can we call that treason? Why not? I mean, they certainly didn’t seem to love our country very much."

There’s actually a very good reason why not: The Constitution.

"It was a profoundly stupid and ignorant statement," said Carlton F.W. Larson, a law professor at the the University of California-Davis who is writing a book about treason and the American Revolution. "There are occasional hard cases where it is debatable whether something constitutes treason. But this is not one of them."

Mod: The rest of the article can be read at the link. Included are PolitiFact's reasons for calling out Trump for some pretty extreme fibbing. Needless to say, Trump has been receiving criticism over his treason allegations in some other places as well.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth: ‘Cadet Bone Spurs’ Won’t Tell Me When To Clap (Huffington Postlink): Iraq War veteran and U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) criticized President Donald Trump for calling Democrats who did not clap during his State of the Union address “treasonous” on Monday. “We don’t live in a dictatorship or a monarchy,” Duckworth tweeted soon after he made the comment. “I swore an oath ― in the military and in the Senate ― to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not to mindlessly cater to the whims of Cadet Bone Spurs and clap when he demands I clap.”

This is not the first time Duckworth, a Black Hawk helicopter pilot who received the Purple Heart after she lost both her legs in Iraq when her helicopter was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade, has referred to Trump as “Cadet Bone Spurs,” a reference to Trump’s stated reason for not being drafted during the Vietnam War.

During a floor speech last month, she also called Trump a “five-deferment draft dodger” as she slammed the president for criticizing Democrats’ support for the military.

“I spent my entire adult life looking out for the well-being, the training, the equipping of the troops for whom I was responsible,” she said. “I will not be lectured about what our military needs by a five-deferment draft dodger.”

Dem senator on Trump's 'treason' charge: 'Maybe he's been watching too much North Korean television'(CNNlink): A Democratic senator suggested Monday that President Donald Trump might be inspired by North Korea's "dear leader" cult of personality, shortly after Trump quipped that Democrats committed "treason" when they did not applaud his State of the Union. "Maybe he's been watching too much North Korean television where everybody in the North Korean assembly stands up and they all clap together automatically whenever the dear leader says something,"Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse told CNN's Wolf Blitzer in an interview.

Whitehouse's comments followed Trump's assertion that the cold reception he got from Democrats last week was "un-American" and might well be called "treasonous."

"Can we call that treason? Why not,"Trump said in Ohio.

Whitehouse said it was Trump's displeasure with people in disagreement with him that was un-American. "That's not the way America works,"Whitehouse said. "I think that the most un-American thing was what the President said that there oughtn't be dispute or disagreement with him among senators and members of the House of Representatives."

Cadet Bone Spurs Wants A Washington DC Military Parade

Mod: This isn't going over well, either.


sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Sierra Madre City Council Hopeful Andy Bencosme Is Holding His Campaign Kickoff Event In ... Arcadia?

$
0
0

Carpetbaggers of the world unite! OK, that was far too easy. Let's get serious for a few seconds. This self-proclaimed MENSA guy, Andy Bencosme, is he really as sharp as some people claim he is? If you think so, let me ask you a few questions. Ready?

If you were running for City Council in Sierra Madre, and you happened to be a Century 21 Real Estate management guy of note, would you hold your big "campaign kickoff" fundraising event in the City of Arcadia? A place tragically afflicted with some very significant McMansion issues?

Would you actually believe that there is no place in Sierra Madre good enough for so exalted an event such as yours? Would you purposefully avoid taking your business to some place in downtown Sierra Madre? Maybe because you think that none of the restaurants here are quite good enough for you and your chosen clientele?

Would you be afraid that if your big event was held in Sierra Madre you might have to deal with some of the local riffraff? People you do not care to associate with too much? Or have to answer their annoying questions?

There is also this. Would you restrict your campaign kickoff event to people who for the most part do not even live in the city where you are running for office? While purposely excluding many of those that actually do? Would you do that? Is there a reason?

Look at the time this campaign kickoff event is taking place. 4:30 in the afternoon, and on a Tuesday. A time when most good Sierra Madreans are off somewhere else working for a living. Or fighting traffic on the freeways trying to get home. Or making sure the kids are doing their homework, while you are also cooking their dinner.

The people that invitation went out to are predominantly corporate Realtors and millionaire developers. People who have not always had the best interests of Sierra Madreans at heart. Folks who only see this little place as an underdeveloped, though quaint, housing market ripe for the taking. A city where they could make lots of money, if only they were given the free reign to do so. It is literally all they care about here.

So is this what Arcadia Andy's real constituency is? The people who he is running for office to represent? Big money out-of-town real estate and development players who only see Sierra Madre as a place to make a quick couple bucks in the bad neighbor housing racket? At the expense of the people who actually live here, and have for a long time?

Apparently, and sadly, that answer is yes.


Here is something else I should probably ask you. Would you have your event sponsored by an organization that has become notorious over the years for having worked to push high-density and McMansion development in Sierra Madre? A city that has prospered greatly by keeping that sort of predatory, and highly generic, development out?

That is what the Arcadia Association of Realtors has been about for years. It is the same organization that spent a fortune ten years ago to stop Measure V, only to be dragged to the polls by the people of Sierra Madre and soundly beaten. But had they won? Downtown Sierra Madre would now look exactly like any other town that had been sold out to Andy's supporters.

Sierra Madre has become a highly desired place to live and raise a family because it fought off those things. Property values here have risen to levels never before imagined. Why? Because this town stayed authentic. Generic McMansionization and stack/pack development were never allowed to set their roots here.

But both have long been advocated by the AAR and the people invited by Andy Bencosme to attend his Sierra Madre campaign kickoff event. Which is being held in Arcadia.

Attended by people who mostly don't even even live here. Yet each will gladly fork over a few hundred bucks to Andy Bencosme on February 20 because he will give them something that they have wanted for years. Unfettered access and the ability to to do whatever they want in Sierra Madre.

Quid pro quo. No matter what the likes of you might have to say about it.

It really is astonishing. Both crass and clueless, and at the same time.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

CNBC: Dow plummets 1032 points, now down 10% from record; S&P 500 drops 3.7% to new low for week

$
0
0
Mod: There used to be this guy that would show up on this site who, no matter how badly it would be going nationally that day, would talk about how wonderful things are with his investments. We haven't seen him much lately. So here's my question. When do those who write articles like the one below shift from talking about a "correction" to that of a full on red eyed bull goose run amuck panic? We have got to be close to that.

Dow plummets 1032 points, now down 10% from record; S&P 500 drops 3.7% to new low for week (CNBClink): Stocks fell sharply on Thursday as strong earnings and economic data were not enough to quell jitters on Wall Street about higher interest rates.

The Dow Jones industrial average closed 1,032.89 points lower at 23,860.46, entering correction territory. The 30-stock index also closed at its lowest level since Nov. 28. The Dow is also on track to post its biggest weekly decline since October 2008.

"This whole correction is really about rates. It's really about inflation creeping up. It's really about people thinking the Fed is either behind the curve or actually has to be more aggressive,"Stephanie Link, global asset management managing director at TIAA, told CNBC's "Closing Bell."

"That fear, that unknown is really what's driving a lot of the anxiety,"Link said.

This is the third drop for the Dow greater than 500 points in the last five days. Despite the decline Thursday, the average is still a ways from its low for the week hit on Tuesday of 23,778.74. American Express and Intel were the worst-performing stocks in the index, sliding more than 5.4 percent. J.P. Morgan Chase, meanwhile, was down by more than 4 percent.

The S&P 500 pulled back 3.75 percent to 2,581, reaching a new low for the week. The index also broke below its 100-day moving average and closed under 2,600, two important thresholds. For the S&P 500, it is its third drop of greater than 2 percent in the last five days.

The Nasdaq composite fell 3.9 percent to close at 6,777.16 as Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft all fell at least 4.5 percent.

"The market is focused on higher interest rates right now," said Kate Warne, investment strategist at Edward Jones. "The underlying fundamentals are going to drive stocks higher, but I think the path higher will be more volatile than it's been in the past few years."

The benchmark 10-year U.S. note yield rose to 2.88 percent before slipping to 2.848 percent Thursday, holding around multi-year highs. The initial move higher follows the release of strong jobless claims data. Weekly jobless claims hit a 45-year low, totaling 221,000. They fell from 230,000 in the previous week. 

Mod: Remember this. If things continue to worsen on the stock market, you can always shift your investments over to lottery tickets.

Military Times poll: Majority oppose Trump's military parade (The Hilllink): An informal Military Times poll found that a vast majority of the publication’s readers oppose the idea of a military parade in Washington, D.C.

The publication, an independent news source that covers the armed forces for service members and their families, published the results of its poll, which was launched on its website Wednesday. The poll asked readers “should there be a parade showing troops and military equipment in Washington, D.C.?”

Eighty-nine percent of Military Times readers responded by answering “No, it’s a waste of money and troops are too busy.” Just 11 percent responded by answering “Yes, it’s a great opportunity to show off U.S. military might.” The publication noted that more than 51,000 readers had voted in the poll as of Thursday afternoon.

Mod: 89%. Wow.

The Tattler goes pulp
If you pick up a copy of The Sierra Madre Weekly from any of their conveniently located news racks downtown, you will notice that in the lower lefthand corner there is a section dedicated to TheSierra Madre Tattler. I now have a weekly opinion piece there. Quite happy about that. The column will be appearing weekly in the Pasadena Independent as well. It's a regular media blitz out there.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Pasadena Facebook Page In An Emoji Uproar Over Tattler Revelations About Pasadena Unified Going Bankrupt

$
0
0
Mod: I'm telling you, until your always friendly neighborhood  Tattler started spreading the word about the impending, and quite probable, bankruptcy of the Pasadena Unified School District, nobody knew a thing about it.

The photo on the left was lifted from a Facebook page called "Pasadena Politics," which is a rather elite members-only site that caters to a clientele that often ostentatiously claims to be more highly informed about the goings-on in the Rotten Rose than the likes of you. It is a screenshot of my op-ed column as it originally appeared on the front page of the Pasadena Independent, sister publication to the Sierra Madre Weekly. As of this typing it has caused close to 40 emotional and emoji-laden comments on the Pasadena Politics page, many of which are from parents of PUSD students that apparently have been stunned by the news.

Why weren't they told about this before, you ask? Do read on, friends. There is a reason.

I checked in late this week with Sierra Madre's always communicative City Manager, Gabe Engeland, and asked him if he had heard anything more about the matter from anyone associated with the Pasadena Unified School District. Including taciturn resident elected Board of Education member LarryTorres. His answer was no, nobody has said a word to him. Nor is this matter agendized for next Tuesday evening's City Council meeting.

I had previously forwarded to Gabe the now famous letter put out by the Los Angeles County Office of Education (link). This is the agency that first broke the news of PUSD's near-imminent date with financial insolvency. The City Manager's reply at that time was rather succinct. "That letter doesn’t paint a pretty picture."

I do hope he passed it on to others.

Here are a couple of passages from the letter that offer some details on the PUSD's possible fiscal collapse. First, some not very happy numbers.


And what is the cause of so dire a report? That's easy. Larry Torres and nearly all members of the Board of Education were literally giving away the farm. Mostly to the very same people that so generously sent big dollars their way when they were out campaigning for their Board seats.


The PUSD's Board of Education might not be as communicative about this matter as we are at both The Tattler and the Sierra Madre Weekly, but that doesn't mean at least one Board member isn't willing to now chat about it on Facebook.

Pasadena's own, the often excessively verbose Patrick Cahalan, who was elected to the Board of Education the same year as Larry Torres, might not like to talk to any City Hall employees, newspapers, blogs or radio stations, but he can certainly let loose within the controlled confines of a closely moderated members-only Facebook page. Especially now that The Tattler has let the cat out of the bag.

Here is one interesting exchange. It deals with the Special Education budget, which is now being literally hacked into pieces. Note how many different times Cahalan blames other government agencies for problems he himself bears some responsibility for.

Marlene Benites: We are a hot mess!!! And the only ones paying the price are our students and educators ....... especially our special education population 😠😠😠. They had to see this coming. It didn't happen over night 🙄🙄🙄🙄.

Patrick Cahalan: The Special Education budget went up from the adopted June budget to the first interim budget in December. This was a significant increase in SPED which actually drove a good chunk of our operating deficit up to crisis levels. I am not blaming the SPED community for this; those kids need those services. Ultimately, this is the fault of the state and the federal government: our funding for special education from those sources has been flat at $19 million since 2013-14 even while the cost of the SELPA has gone up to over $53 million. 

We have pulled $147 million our of our general budget to fund increases in SPED costs in the last five years. And it legitimately isn't enough. That, plus PERS and STRS pension contribution increasing by over 300% (from 8.25% to 23-25% depending upon bargaining unit) between now and 2023-24 are the two biggest issues. The PERS/STRS evaluation changed in January 2017 and the governor's budget wasn't finalized until June, well after the March 15th deadline to lay people off.

As far as not communicating any of this previously? Cahalan has this to say:

We have been talking about huge cuts since June. The board meeting videos are on the web site.

Apparently if you wanted to know about things like the PUSD's impending collision with insolvency, you would have needed to wade through many long hours of opaque Board of Education meeting video footage to get to that news. Obviously you must be lazy, and the fault is yours.

Cahalan then launched into the following fairly lengthy screed, one that he believes sheds light on some of the problems. See if you can make any sense of it.

Patrick Cahalan: Jonathan and I have talked about our district's spending multiple times and (for the record) I agree with him that we don't spend enough on direct instruction and we spend too much on administration.

The main reasons why we underpay our teachers aren't related as much to central administration costs as they are student support services, however. Cutting administrative cost is necessary and important, but it's not going to free up sufficient funds to, say, lower our class sizes in middle school. We have already cut the Chief Academic Officer position (technically, we didn't fill it), and we've merged functions under Dr. Blanco's office. 

We had to hire a new HR Chief, however, because we have open contracts and we're going to have to lay off a number of people this year, which will institute a lot of bumping, all of which needs to be processed by an experienced HR person. There will undoubtedly be other changes in central admin. We're laying off three director positions as part of the fiscal stabilization plan, that will cut our admin percentage noticeably.

There are three big increasing costs that are impossible to deny: increasing health and welfare costs (which thanks to action at the federal level are undoubtedly going to go up more next year than projected), increasing pension costs, and increasing special education costs. All three of those dwarf savings we would get by eliminating the other inefficiencies in the district (which, again, we still need to do and I'm not suggesting otherwise).

Student support services take up a much larger share of our budget than they do in those other districts that he mentions. We spend a *lot* of money on transportation costs and student support services that Arcadia does not. Point of fact, we just voted, as part of the fiscal stabilization plan, to eliminate a large chunk of general education bus service, to bring that cost more in line with neighboring districts.

It's arguable that spending the money on classroom size reduction is more effective than some of these student support services, and in some cases (depending upon the support service in question)... I personally agree.

However, it's also important to note that a lot of these services are advocated for by stakeholders in the district, many of whom are parents and demand that their own voices be heard as well - justifiably so.

That general ed bus budget cut is going to affect a number of our students' families. They're going to be unhappy with that cut, and that's understandable.

We had to eliminate a lot of the TOSA positions. For years we've received feedback that our certificated out-of-the-classroom ratio is too high. TOSA positions are ones that teachers, generally, actually *like*, because they like coaching and curriculum support. I've received negative email from teachers asking me to keep those positions. But that's not in-the-classroom instruction either.

We are cutting the Ombuds position this year. That's an administrative position that I lobbied hard to add two years ago. I would have liked to see the position stand for another couple of years to see if it would, indeed, lower our litigation load, but given the state of the budget it's simply something we can't afford.

Was that position unnecessary administration? Was that a pet project of mine? Was it more effective than adding three aides? That depends upon how you view the tradeoffs, I suppose. I advocated for it because the special education community *wanted* that position, however, not because I wanted to add to central administration.

It's entirely possible to have conflicting opinions about what is the best thing to do to tackle some of our problems, all in good faith.

Cahalan then says something that I found rather troubling. That being he doesn't think this is really any of your business. Oh, that and dig the crazy acronyms.

The proper place to hammer out these conversations is really not in the newspaper, and it's not here on Facebook, but in the parent and community groups that exist for these purposes: the CAC, the AAPC, the District Advisory Council, the DELAC, the LCAP PAC.

These groups all have public meetings and I highly encourage *everyone* in this community who is interested in public education to participate in them.

CAC indeed. That certainly does put the PUSD Board of Education's position justifying embargoing news of its financial disaster into a nutshell. Keep it out of the newspapers and other media that taxpayers such as yourself depend upon for information, and restrict the conversation to acronymic and obscure special interest bailiwicks that officials such as himself can more easily control.

I personally would not agree with that.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Help Me Out Here. Can You Really Re-Elect a Mayor in Sierra Madre?

$
0
0
I was perusing Facebook reading Tony Brandenburg posts while sitting in a Starbucks somewhere in LA last night. I was waiting for my younger son and his girlfriend to exit a concert starring a Chinese-American rapper unhappily named Chigga, and it was very late. Long story behind all that.

There are times that I regret all of the music I exposed my kids to when they were younger. My 25 or so years in the music business have come back to haunt me. Which is why I found myself sitting in a Starbucks in LA after midnight amongst cell phone addicted people a third of my age.

But I digress. After reading how Tony's own cell phone, which hadn't been working for six weeks, suddenly came back to life as if by magic, and on his birthday no less, I noticed that a campaign advertisement had popped up on the right side of the page.

Much to my surprise it was a Rachelle Arizmendi ad, and it had a puzzling message. It was asking me to help re-elect Rachelle the Mayor of Sierra Madre. I didn't know you could do that. I'm pretty sure the City Council is on a rotation system in Sierra Madre, and after Rachelle's year as Mayor is up in April she'll have to wait until her turn comes around again. Which by my count would be around five years from now.

Slim Shady
OK, I'm pulling your leg. I really do know the answer. Apparently this is just another bone-headed error by her campaign manager, the Pasadena pro-utility tax Republican Martin Truitt. Considering what a bloody mess (literally) his now elected candidates have made of Pasadena, you'd think a little shame might kick in and he'd want to stick to his accounting. Just leave local politics to the more detail oriented amateurs. Right?

Rachelle's campaign webpage can be found here. It doesn't say a whole lot, but then what politician shares anything of substance these days? I guess it works. Your average voting fool is far more appreciative of cotton candy than they are anything approaching the red meat issues we lovingly dote upon.

To help belabor my point, here is an example from Rachelle's website. Check this out:

"Important issues remain. We need to maintain fiscal discipline, protect our water system, complete the infrastructure improvement plan, work with the PUSD to maintain the quality of our neighborhood schools, and continue promoting a safe community."

As readers of this blog are aware, the PUSD has been declared in real danger of slipping into insolvency, and being taken over by Los Angeles County. Or even, heavens help us, Sacramento. As a result they're throwing howling educator bodies out onto the streets left and right. Yet this disturbing issue has yet to be agendized by Mayor Arizmendi for discussion by the City Council. Can it be she really doesn't know?

Or perhaps Martin told her none of that will matter to most Sierra Madre voters. Their kids attend private schools.

Chatting with the City Manager
I keep emailing reader questions to City Manager Gabe Engeland on a regular basis. You should as well. He turns around his answers in mere minutes sometimes. It is quite astonishing. Here are some of the questions he has answered lately.

Sierra Madre TattlerI posted this on the City of Sierra Madre Facebook page, where it was immediately marked as spam. I tried again, this time using smiley face emojis, but no such luck. Anyway, you might want to get the City Council to address this at their next meeting. It could be important to a few people.
https://sierramadretattler.blogspot.com/2018/02/los-angeles-county-office-of-education.html

Gabe EngelandWow, that letter doesn’t paint a pretty picture. Sorry the story wasn’t posted on the City’s FB. Our social media policy does not allow links to outside sites/sources.

Sierra Madre TattlerSeems exclusionary. Why is that? 

Gabe EngelandIt’s a pretty common practice for social media management. The main reason is cities are not able to verify which sites are safe or appropriate. If a link is on a city page, it is assumed to be a trusted source. I forget which city it was, but they allowed a link to manage credit profiles after the Equifax data breach.  The site looked legitimate, but as it turns out, it was actually a phishing scam.  Residents used the link because the city posted it and ended up having their private information stolen.

Sierra Madre TattlerIt explains the pretty minimal participation on the city's Facebook page. That's ok. Why would I want competition? Is there a due date for the survey cards. Several have asked. 

Gabe EngelandI agree, the FB page has been more about disseminating information than dialogue exchange. We are able to see how many people view the post(s), so we know it’s effective at getting the message out. Certainly we don’t have the same interaction, comments, etc., as a private page. The due date to mail back should be two weeks after the second mailing. I believe the second mailing goes out next Monday, so people have until the end of February to reply online or by mail.

This next exchange of e-mails took place a few days later.

Sierra Madre Tattler: Couple of questions for you today.
1) Folks are receiving their second Library survey cards today. Do you know how many have been filled out and sent back so far? I have been asked that. 
2) The temporary traffic device(s) down by Kersting Court. What exactly do they do? Been asked that as well. If you have something prepared by the device manufacturer that you could forward to me that would be a bonus. 

Gabe Engeland: We haven't asked for an update on return numbers yet, but will likely receive one next week. The traffic study device on SM Blvd measures, I believe, total car and pedestrian traffic and is being used to determine if we need to make safety changes to our crosswalks.

Sierra Madre TattlerThanks. One more question. Have you been updated in any way about the PUSD and its insolvency issue? Such a huge issue, and outside of my small site (and the slightly larger Pasadena Now), nobody is saying a peep. 

Gabe Engeland: No, I have not heard anything additional.  

That is all I have for you this morning. Have a wonderful Sunday.

sierramadretattler.blogspot.com
Viewing all 4055 articles
Browse latest View live