Quantcast
Channel: The Sierra Madre Tattler!
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4055

California State Controller John Chiang's Figures Don't Quite Match What We've Been Hearing From City Hall

$
0
0
Sierra Madre 2010
What we have to offer you today are two screen shots from California State Controller John Chiang's website. Click on each to enlarge. This particular site is dedicated to the cause of tracking the amounts of money cities such as ours pay their employees. And if you have been following some of the arguments being put out by City Hall to justify extending our combined state leading utility tax rates into the distant year of 2022, then you will notice something here that seems a bit out of sync with much of what we have all been hearing for a while.

The first screen shot is from the year 2010, which you can also link to directly by clicking here. What this shows is that the City of Sierra Madre employed 276 people that year, and paid all of them combined a total of $5,410,910.00. An additional $992,452.00 was tagged for retirement and health costs. Or a $3,596.00 average in benefit costs per employee.

Sierra Madre 2012
However, between 2010 and 2012, the City of Sierra Madre had to make some drastic cutbacks. Or so we have been told, and on more than one occasion. The loss of Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) funds to Sacramento took a significant chunk of cash out of the City's wherewithal, a serious problem that needed to be dealt with. The overall tax take also took a big hit, mostly due to effects from the Great Recession. Positions were eliminated and hours reduced, with the total employed here declining from an equivalent of 276 employees to 230. This represented a notable drop in the headcount, one that we were told resulted in significant savings.

We have often heard that the City had been forced to cut to the bone, and did. And once having made such sacrifices, due to both bad economic conditions and the raking off of CRA funds by the State, everything that possibly could be done was done. There is just nothing left to cut without doing significant damage to our community.

So then how do you explain Sierra Madre's salary and benefits picture posted on the State Comptroller's website for 2012 (link)? While it is true that total salaries here dropped by $585,358.00 to $4,824,552.00, benefit and retirement costs soared from $992,452.00 to $2,045,825.00. A huge increase to $8,895.00 per employee, or way more than double that of 2010.

Which means that total yearly employee costs, rather than having been significantly cut, instead actually increased during this period, going from $6,403,662.00 to $6,870,377.00. And rather than a million plus dollars in savings during the two year period as some have claimed, it appears that this money was instead plowed into increased employee benefit and retirement costs.

So what it all means, at least based on what you can see on the State Controller's site, is that this City's often stated demand that our combined utility taxes must remain at the very highest levels in California really is being driven by the need to fund vastly more expensive retirement and benefit costs.

This, rather than the implied dark threats to public safety and the library that we have been hearing so much about from certain hostage taking City Councilmembers, is what is really driving the demand to maintain our high utility taxes.

It could also be having an effect on the water rate increases as well. After all, the less General Fund money that potentially would have to be used to fund Water Department needs (in particular bond debt service), the more is freed up to fund the kinds of retirement and benefit increases described above.

So go figure.

http://sierramadretattler.blogspot.com

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4055

Trending Articles